Search for: "State v. So " Results 4801 - 4820 of 117,194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2010, 2:15 pm by Brian Evans
Sadly, this is the classic “Finality v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 11:00 am
 So the thing that the Supreme Court implicitly thought would never actually happen does indeed happen in our great state. [read post]
Indeed, in some cases, Indiana has gone so far as to mandate the application of federal rules to state law. [read post]
No timeline was given for the new maps to be redrawn but Judge Dick ordered the state be given a “reasonable amount of time” to do so. [read post]
In doing so, the federal court held that the state could not bring the challenge in a previously filed lawsuit regarding prior EEOC guidance but, instead, must file a new lawsuit. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 8:12 am by Kevin Kaufman
For tax year 2021, Michigan’s personal exemption has increased to $4,900, up from $4,750 in 2020.[6] In New Jersey, A10 was enacted in September 2020, expanding the state’s so-called “millionaire’s tax. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The questions for the Supreme Court were firstly whether it is unlawful for the Secretary of State to exercise his power to provide MLA so as to supply evidence to a foreign state that will facilitate the imposition of the death penalty in that state on the individual and secondly whether it is lawful under the Data Protection Act 2018, Part 3 for law enforcement authorities in the UK to transfer personal data to law enforcement authorities abroad for… [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 3:03 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Lord Carnwath stated that the CJEU said producing a plan complying with art 23(1) did not itself mean the member state had met its obligations under art 13, and it was for the national court to take “any necessary measure” so that the authority establishes a plan required by the Directive when there had been a failure to comply with art 13 and lack of application to postpone the deadline under art 22. [read post]