Search for: "State v. Welcome" Results 4801 - 4820 of 6,372
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2011, 7:54 am by Audrey Ah-Kan, Olswang
Another High Court judgment, Cattles Plc v Welcome Financial Services Ltd & Ors [2009] EWHC 3027, in a similar case in which the Rule had also not been specifically excluded, was handed down within days of Mills. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:48 am by war
Myall Australia Pty Ltd v RPL Central Pty Ltd [2011] APO 48 (link to be provided when available) Lid dip: Patentology [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm by Stu Ellis
” Similar results have been reported by Iowa State fertility specialist John Sawyer. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 2:25 pm by Kenneth Anderson
In that sense, I welcome judicial moves to cut back the ATS. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA and others v eBay International AG and others. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 7:30 am by Ingrid Wuerth
There are many issues I have not addressed in this post, including international law and comparative analysis, and comments on all aspects of foreign official/state immunity are welcome. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
But did you know that many states have their own mini-WARN acts? [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
  Appointments direct from other areas of the legal profession, based on merit, will be welcomed by many as an important step towards furthering this goal. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
 I welcome guest posts from responsible commentators on topics relevant to this blog. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
 I welcome guest posts from responsible commentators on topics relevant to this blog. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 8:23 am
The only exception is Kenya, where the prosecutor is exercising proprio motu powers granted him by statute.It is also true that violence and atrocity occurred in each state -- that, as ICC Deputy Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda has said, there are victims and others in Africa's civil society who welcome the court's efforts to effect accountability.These truths seldom appear in stories like yesterday's. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 11:01 am
Mrs Macken’s support for more openness was most welcome, as has been IPKAT’s in related earlier commentary. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
We recommend section 1 be amended both to state the survival of common law innocent dissemination – as recently clarified in Metropolitan Schools v DesignTechnica [2009] EWHC 1765 (QB) – and to bring the scope of section 1 into line with the Ecommerce Directive -or better still, to delete the current section and cross-refer to the protection of the Directive. [read post]