Search for: "U S Attorney" Results 4801 - 4820 of 7,604
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2012, 3:51 pm
Two caregivers are charged with physically abusing a young autistic man inside his family’s home. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 7:57 am
This week, a federal grand jury heard evidence and testimony surrounding the events that took place on August 19, 2012, in the ship's cabin U-212. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:48 pm by Stan
DLA Piper, a global law firm noted for high-profile attorneys, should rethink its work for China’s ZTE Corp, two Republican members of the U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:13 am by J. Adam Engel
Engel, Doctrinal Collapse: Smart Phones Cause Courts to Reconsider Fourth Amendment Searches of Electronic Devices, 41 U. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:13 am by J. Adam Engel
Engel, Doctrinal Collapse: Smart Phones Cause Courts to Reconsider Fourth Amendment Searches of Electronic Devices, 41 U. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:59 am by Brian D. Lerner
First, the prospective adoptive parent(s) obtain(s) an approved home study from an accredited provider, licensed in the state of the adoptive parent(s), and authorized to conduct such studies. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:34 am by Gerald Gregory Lutkenhaus
This also illustrates Abraham Lincoln’s famous saying, "He who represents himself has a fool for an attorney. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 2:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Therefore, based upon the totality of plaintiff BREYTMAN'S frivolous conduct in making the instant motion, the Court finds it is appropriate to award costs of $1,700.00 to defendants SCHECHTER for 10 hours of attorney's fees at $170.00 per hour. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:29 am
" Whether or not Padmore is a valuable case to add to your defensive arsenal is something to discuss with your DWI attorney. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:04 am
Judge Ungaro rejected the Cour de Cassation's interpretation of the forum non conveniens doctrine under Montreal Article 33. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:04 am
Judge Ungaro rejected the Cour de Cassation's interpretation of the forum non conveniens doctrine under Montreal Article 33. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:00 pm by Joe Sanders
The three-judge appeals panel traveled to I-U-P-U-I to hear the case before an audience of law students. [read post]