Search for: "United States Court of Appeals,second Circuit"
Results 4801 - 4820
of 10,593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
In Smith v. the United States, 599 U.S. ____ (2023), the U.S. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 1:16 pm
In Smith v. the United States, 599 U.S. ____ (2023), the U.S. [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:26 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit’s reasoning in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
”The federal district court who heard this case sided with the plaintiffs after a trial and issued a permanent injunction that prevents the State of Texas from enforcing this law (unless and until it wins on appeal or gets an appellate court to stay the order pending appeal). [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
District Court also noted decisions from two other circuits, one from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in In re Spong, 661 F.2d. 6 (1981) and one from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in Matter of Gwinn, 20 B.R. 233 (1982). [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 3:38 am
Circuit has refused to hear an emergency appeal. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 8:03 pm
For instance, in the new Seventh Circuit case, United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 1:46 pm
Musika died after the trial.While there can always be delays of any kind, or even a settlement (though it wouldn't make sense for Apple to settle as long as some key legal issues are unresolved), the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is now in the best position to prevent the second trial from taking place in November. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm
The Second Circuit must grant the motion to withdraw, but assuming it is granted, it appears that the appeal would be withdrawn, meaning that the lower court dismissal of the case would stand. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:02 am
On August 16, 2011, the United Stated Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upheld a decision authorizing a debtor to reimburse qualified bidders participating in the second-round of bidding at an auction for the sale of a substantial estate asset. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:49 am
These alterations to cornerstones of patent law will shape the dynamics of every patent application, every infringement assertion, and every patent lawsuit—everywhere in the United States. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:58 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit — have interpreted the Supreme Court’s ruling last Term in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am
., the Louisiana Second Circuit addressed issues affecting the creation and preservation of mineral servitudes and payment of court costs in a concursus action.[1] In the case, an operator initiated a concursus action seeking to resolve ownership interest in minerals underlying property on which it was operating. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am
., the Louisiana Second Circuit addressed issues affecting the creation and preservation of mineral servitudes and payment of court costs in a concursus action.[1] In the case, an operator initiated a concursus action seeking to resolve ownership interest in minerals underlying property on which it was operating. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am
., the Louisiana Second Circuit addressed issues affecting the creation and preservation of mineral servitudes and payment of court costs in a concursus action.[1] In the case, an operator initiated a concursus action seeking to resolve ownership interest in minerals underlying property on which it was operating. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 7:33 am
Unites States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 4:01 pm
Since then, it has stepped up the rate of denials, and is tied for last among all circuit courts in the United States for 2010, granting only 4.9% of appeals in that year (compared to a 21% grant rate in the Seventh Circuit, 15.9% in the Ninth, 13.5% in the Fifth, and 10.7% in the Third). [read post]
23 May 2012, 9:56 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
The First Circuit Court of Appeals, on the other hand found the statute to be legal in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:32 am
For example, in United States v. [read post]
