Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 4801 - 4820
of 14,193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2010, 11:59 am
United States, a sentencing guidelines case, may prompt the U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 11:00 am
United States v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 10:59 am
Just this week, however, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed those concerns. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 8:15 pm
A close look on this definition demonstrates that this concept has two dimensions. [read post]
22 May 2015, 10:59 am
Just this week, however, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed those concerns. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:22 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 3:30 pm
In Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 am
” And in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 6:55 pm
United States that some standard needed to be created for what constitutes a "violent felony," this case is the proper vehicle for setting that standard. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 7:26 pm
United States (overturning Harris v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
He added that, even now, he does not know why the closings occurred. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 9:52 am
Turkey has refused to return Brunson to the United States, and both nations have imposed retaliatory tariffs. [read post]
Case o' The Week: First Impression, Depression - Cervantes and Cali "Mandatory Supervision" Searches
25 Jun 2017, 8:13 am
Jaywalking is dangerous.United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:18 am
By their decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 6:30 am
I read this passage as suggesting that the much-maligned “economic/non-economic” distinction in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 8:10 am
United States, and can be read here. [read post]
13 Jul 2024, 3:13 pm
If the Supreme Court did not so conclude in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:45 am
The Brandenburg v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:06 pm
The case arises from a challenge to the transfer of personal data from the EU (via Ireland) to the United States, which relied on a Commission Decision 2000/520 stating that the Safe Harbour system in place in the United States was ‘adequate’ as permitted by Article 25 Data Protection Directive. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:39 am
“The right to public access ‘serves to promote trustworthiness of the judicial process, to curb judicial abuses, and to provide the public with a more complete understanding of the judicial system, including a better perception of its fairness.'” United States v. [read post]
