Search for: "Waits v. State"
Results 4801 - 4820
of 10,692
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
To take just one example, while TCRR cites Alexander Polikoff’s Waiting for Gautreaux for the fact that 65 of the 75 staff attorneys in the Civil Rights Division protested the Justice Department’s change of position in Alexander v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 9:37 am
Interlocutory appeal for medical residents at state hospitals (two cases) Geoffrey Klein, M.D. and Baylor College of Medicine v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 1:09 pm
A 1994 California case, Jefferson v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 5:01 pm
The application (DeWine v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 4:06 am
Michelin Employee Sues Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston For Disability Benefits In Robert Weathers v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 11:49 am
An unhappy party could file a state complaint wait for the results and then file a due process hearing over the same dispute. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:19 am
Regardless, the New Jersey Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 12:12 pm
In a case called State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:03 pm
Relying on precedent from Lamb v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 8:16 am
See State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 3:45 am
Cox earlier on Monday said she couldn’t wait on the Supreme Court’s decision and would leave the state for care. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 10:14 am
State v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 7:26 pm
Cmwlth. 2000) (holding that claimant who quit to return to another state to care for his emotionally disturbed child was eligible for benefits); Miksic v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:07 am
This column addressed the Ninth Circuit’s decision in the case Petrella v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:36 am
Oh wait, you haven’t paid yet. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:07 pm
” Citing Palmer v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 6:08 pm
Lackie, 2017 ONCA 716 Cobb v. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 9:57 pm
Schloesser v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:34 am
So the Tennessee Supreme Court is really interested in making sure the mandate of Gideon v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
" If a state has a 24-hour waiting period law and a woman seeks an abortion 23 hours before her fetus is viable, should a court evaluate and uphold it on the authority of the undue burden portion of Casey or should the Court invalidate it under the no-pre-viability-ban portion of Roe that Casey reaffirmed? [read post]
