Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 4801 - 4820
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2022, 10:32 am
From last week's decision by Fifth Circuit Judge Gregg Costa (joined by Judges Carolyn Dineen King and Don Willett) in Bell v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 6:51 am
" Don't count Arthur Sears in that group. [read post]
2 May 2011, 9:28 am
They didn't see my presentation, so they don't know what the photos look like, how the Plaintiff presents, or anything else that has been driving the mediation. [read post]
2 May 2011, 9:28 am
They didn't see my presentation, so they don't know what the photos look like, how the Plaintiff presents, or anything else that has been driving the mediation. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 5:13 am
But I don't think there's anything illegal about such class assignments. [3.] [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 3:49 am
According to Defendants the Court’s ruling may “cause a tremendous chilling effect on the core functionality of the web”. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 9:40 am
… It sounds to me like we're going down the path towards secret trials, which we don't have. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:37 am
Even then, the better course might be thought to adopt the Obama Administration's position on DOMA: Enforce but don't defend, so as to facilitate a justiciable case or controversy, and then if the courts definitively uphold the law, simply enforce it. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 3:57 pm
We want to make sure alcohol beverages are treated with special care and...that they don't get into the wrong hands. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Don’t blame others. [read post]
10 Apr 2025, 11:31 am
But don’t worry! [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:16 am
If the experts don't do it, the pseudoexperts will. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 12:49 pm
Contested Cases The presumption among many clients is that an attorney can testify for them so they don't need to be present. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 2:19 pm
We aren't there yet. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
We don’t expect Vision Media to succeed in its endrun on section 230 immunity. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 1:19 pm
(Actually, it turns out that it is fairly well-written, since he is writing for the government attorneys and judges that might actually need to follow his opinions, rather than condemned prisoners who don't matter, anyway.) [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 12:30 pm
Concurrence: I don't see that in the video at all, so this should be decided at trial, "not by three appellate judges playing junior-varsity jury. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 11:58 am
Don't count me out just yet. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 8:57 am
And sometimes we lose because the courts are lazy or incompetent or (wait, I don't mean that, never happens, if I said it I misspoke, but I didn't say it, delete, delete, delete). [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 10:14 am
Even though we don’t like all of the recent Cornett case (see last week’s post here), the New Jersey Supreme Court at least required facts to go forward. [read post]
