Search for: "Welling v. Welling"
Results 4801 - 4820
of 110,255
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2019, 4:01 pm
Austin v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 12:54 pm
Academics (including me) usually applaud the historical game theoretic aspects of Marbury v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 11:21 am
” Brown v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
All of these options potentially imperil various rights, as well as the efficiency of the process. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 11:31 am
His IQ may well be below 70. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 5:45 pm
"There are lots of other subsidiary holdings in the opinion as well -- e.g., with respect to whether there was personal jurisdiction -- and all those seem right to me as well. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 1:13 pm
" Defendant was eventually handcuffed after a struggle, and went to trial for his crimes.This would well have been the result of psychosis. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 1:49 pm
(Though I imagine he may well have indeed made it.) [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:53 pm
(Especially when, as here, you're likely to lose the appeal anyway -- and might well spend more in legal fees on the appeal even if you won.)Now, I get it, sometimes you just hate the plaintiff, or are vindictive, or want to "strike back" and make their lives miserable. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:02 pm
Given the need for speed, perhaps counsel should be held to the fire as well. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 11:08 am
Not that the opinion isn't written well. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 12:07 pm
It's an exceptionally rare case when I'd say that the failure to give a surrebuttal require a new trial.But when, as here, the AUSA admits he sandbagged the defendant, and makes a new argument in closing that way well not be supported by the evidence and to which the defendant has not chance at all to respond; well, that may well be the exception that proves the rule.P.S. - I still hate the font and format the Ninth Circuit now uses in the slip opinions. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 5:00 am
Plenty, as we see in Dimock v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 6:20 am
Lamont et al v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:16 pm
Pecore v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 3:29 pm
Katz v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:00 pm
The matter of Apple Inc. and NeXT Software Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 4:40 am
That occurred in the case of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 10:24 am
On January 21, 2010, a divided United States Supreme Court ruled to overturn a century of legal precedent in the case Citizens United v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 8:55 am
Here is the abstract: The current debates over Roe v. [read post]
