Search for: "Able v. United States"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 10,815
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2014, 11:40 am
READ PARTS I-V (pp. 101-138 in SSRN version). [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:13 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 [1923]), held that Ofshe's theories have not gained "general acceptance in the scientific community," and refused to allow him to testify for the defense. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 10:30 am
” United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 12:55 am
Motorola ruling is highly influential, Judge James Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington -- with support from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit -- has become the pioneer and thought leader in the U.S. with respect to the adjudication of FRAND licensing terms by federal courts through the substantive and procedural decisions has has already made in the Microsoft v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:30 am
“Even though the Comstock law does not ban abortion literally,” Mitchell has explained, “it bans the shipment or receipt of any abortion-related equipment,” and no abortion takes place in the United States without some item sent in the mail. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 6:17 am
Adam Candeub (Michigan State): Last Friday in NetChoice v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:26 am
Serbaroli, a partner at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, writes that for generations, most not-for-profit hospitals in the United States have been accorded exemptions from almost all forms of taxation. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:07 pm
Among other things, it explains why the mandate runs afoul of the five part test established in the Supreme Court’s most recent Necessary and Proper Clause decision, United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:39 pm
See United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 8:46 am
For filing requirements, please refer to the United States Bankruptcy Code (title 11, United States Code), the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (Bankruptcy Rules), and the Local Rules for the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 10:38 am
As part of my continuing series of famous case law that came from the California Court system, I wanted to discuss what is probably one of the most cited authorities throughout the United States on personal injury law as it relates to claims for emotional distress. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 9:45 am
Our case, Garza v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm
On Tuesday, "[a]fter carefully considering the briefing and conducting oral argument on August 3, 2023," Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Qualcomm's motion for summary judgment in its entirety: In Re: Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation (case no. 17-md-02773-JSC, N.D. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 3:05 am
"In contrast to other employment-related claims, recoveries made on claims relating to violations of the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) may not be taxable income, at least in cases decided in the Federal District Court sitting in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.PENNSYLVANIA FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT SITTING IN PENNSYLVANIA DETERMINES THAT FMLA RECOVERIES ARE NOT TAXABLE AS W-2 INCOME Click Here to read how FMLA Leave and short-term disability benefits fit together.In a… [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 12:00 am
On July 1, 2014, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Young v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 9:37 pm
Peter Crowley v United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (unreported, but noted on the Lawtel subscription-only service) is one of those cases that should never be allowed to happen. [read post]
17 May 2018, 6:53 am
Circuit’s decision in ACA International v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:57 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 11:07 am
Car accidents are the number one cause of death for teens in the United States. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:36 am
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-6083 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 2012 U.S. [read post]
