Search for: "Bounds v. State" Results 4821 - 4840 of 9,960
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2008, 2:26 pm
The appellant raised Stretch v UK 2003 and Tettorini v Russia 2005. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
The state, the town, and the liquor dealers then appealed to the Supreme Court, asking it to rule both that ambiguity about the Solem v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:07 am by Preston Lim
As they pointed out, just a few years earlier, in Kazemi Estate v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:21 am by John Elwood
Florida and Atkins v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
By Atreya Mathur ​​In a world where creativity knows no bounds and the lines between art, inspiration and infringement blur, one art collective stands at the forefront of pushing these boundaries. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 6:00 am by admin
In 1977, the Supreme Court held in Bounds v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 6:53 am by Joy Waltemath
Widmann, it stated in a footnote that sovereign immunity precluded a personal-capacity damages claim filed against state officials. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 12:20 pm by Ruth O'Meara-Costello
It’s also worth noting that in another relatively recent decision, Commonwealth v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 11:09 pm by Karen Ainslie
The Constitutional Court (CC) in SA Revenue Service v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation & Arbitration & others ((2017) 38 ILJ 97 (CC)) has affirmed that use of such language has no place in our constitutional democracy, stating that the word “was meant to visit the worst kind of verbal abuse ever, on another person. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 2:26 am
It would be a strange state of affairs if an insured under a collision contract of insurance were bound to settle with his insurer in time to permit the insurer to prosecute a subrogation claim against the tortfeasor within the time prescribed for limitations of a tort action. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 12:20 pm by Ruth O'Meara-Costello
It’s also worth noting that in another relatively recent decision, Commonwealth v. [read post]