Search for: "Bui v. State"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 9,825
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2014, 6:55 am
Since the M(K) v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:48 am
(Subscription required) — Texas Lawyer The lawyer’s role in protecting cybersecurity in the courts — Houston-based attorney Rachel V. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:59 pm
--Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkOpinion Date: 2/16/11Cite: IBM Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:47 am
This argument failed, the Court stated, because it conflated financial self-dealing with usurpation of a corporate opportunity, with only the latter having been plead and argued on appeal.The Court then examined the church's claim under the standard set forth in Dixon v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 7:49 am
Texas v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 10:28 pm
Brandeis took this position in his dissent in Gilbert v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 4:04 pm
McCormick’s principal defense is straightforward – i.e., whatever plaintiffs’ claims may be about what volume they thought they were buying based on the traditional size of the container, the tins clearly and unambiguously stated the correct volume. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 5:37 pm
The new case, NRA v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:02 am
Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 6:16 am
Yet, as Buis has correctly pointed out, “[r]espect depends on a number of factors which exceed the borders of law. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 10:36 am
Suchanek v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 6:54 am
And he didn’t buy it. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:04 pm
North American Olive Oil Ass’n v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 11:33 am
In Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
Slip Op. 06460 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state (see Opportune N. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is Verghetta v Lawlor, 2016 NY Slip Op 30423(U) [Sup Ct Westchester County Mar. 9, 2016]. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is called Verghetta v Lawlor, and you can read here Justice Scheinkman’s 33-page post-trial decision dated March 9, 2016, the opening paragraph of which aptly sets the stage for the fair-value drama that follows, starring dueling appraisals over two thousand percent apart: This Court is called upon to determine the value of two corporate entities for purposes of permitting the buy-out of a minority shareholder. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is Verghetta v Lawlor, 2016 NY Slip Op 30423(U) [Sup Ct Westchester County Mar. 9, 2016]. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
F.T.C. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 4:03 pm
No tying arrangement existed because the defendants did not require dealers to include gap insurance products in the credit transactions the defendants purchased, or even to buy gap insurance products at all.The decision is Midwest Agency Services, Inc. v. [read post]
