Search for: "California State Bar Court" Results 4821 - 4840 of 10,976
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
It will continue to work, barring something unexpected. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:02 pm by Alex R. McQuade
” The United States’ Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court did not deny a single government request in 2015, according to the Justice Department. [read post]
3 May 2016, 8:33 am by Legal Profession Prof
A disbarment reported in the May 2016 California Bar Journal CHARLES GREG LESTER [#160084], 62, of Covina, was disbarred Jan. 15, 2016 and ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court and make restitution. [read post]
2 May 2016, 6:06 pm by Michael Kraut
However, the New York Supreme Court threw out those charges, because that particular substance didn’t appear on the state’s list of banned substances. [read post]
2 May 2016, 11:39 am by John Floyd
Four months earlier he had stolen a Snickers bar, a Mountain Dew, and a Zebra Cake from a local 7-Eleven. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:49 am by Heather Wallace
The California Chamber of Commerce filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the case of Travelers Casualty & Surety Company et al. v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm by streetartandlaw
So RIME sued Moschino and Scott (California Central District Court, 2:2015cv05900) claiming copyright infringement for misappropriation of his artwork. [read post]
1 May 2016, 7:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The case law is not yet clear; contest promotions case from California; you do see other courts applying Reed to cases otherwise subject to commercial speech doctrine. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 9:16 am by Bill Marler
  A court barred the processor from operating its facility until an independent laboratory and an independent sanitation expert develop a satisfactory Listeria Monitoring Program and until the processor establishes that it will fully comply with that program on an ongoing basis. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 6:47 pm by Juan C. Antúnez
Rutledge points to a California Supreme Court decision from over a hundred years ago for a possible explanation. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 9:25 am by Native American Rights Fund
Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2016dct.htmlIn re Montoya (Bankruptcy - Automatic Stay)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.html State, ex rel. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 6:47 am by Joe May
Unlike other regulatory agencies in the state, the California Coastal Commission may be lobbied directly. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:21 am by John Elwood
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City barring property owners from filing a federal takings claim in federal court until they exhaust state court remedies, when this rule results in numerous jurisdictional “anomalies” and has a “dramatic” negative impact on takings law under San Remo Hotel, L.P. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 10:03 am by Lindsay Stafford Mader
Stay tuned for the May issue of the Texas Bar Journal, which will focus on pro bono issues. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
The same rule that bars searching trash for evidence of drug crimes (as in Boland), the court held yesterday, also bars searching trash for evidence of recycling and composting rule violations. [read post]
Recently, a federal court in the Northern District of California addressed this subject in the high-profile copyright case Oracle v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Section 11 Cases Surge in California State Courts   The plaintiffs’ bar is nothing if not innovative, and its current focus of innovation seems to be Section 11 claims brought in California state courts. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 5:00 pm by John Ehrett
Lee 15-789Issue: (1) Whether, for federal habeas purposes, California’s procedural rule generally barring review of claims that were available but not raised on direct appeal is an “adequate” state-law ground for rejection of a claim; and (2) whether, when a federal habeas petitioner argues that a state procedural default is not an “adequate” state-law ground for rejection of a claim, the burden of persuasion as to adequacy… [read post]