Search for: "Caming v. United States" Results 4821 - 4840 of 9,170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2011, 5:30 am by Kevin
For more on this topic, including the story of the one published legal opinion involving moon-rock ownership, see "United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 6:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
Persia NavidiReaders of this blog well know that one of the current hot topics in the world of D&O is ESG – and not just in the United States, but in Europe, and elsewhere as well. [read post]
The SmithKline panel instead decided that Witt’s rational-basis-review approach is inconsistent with—and thus no longer binding because of—the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
This time, Mattel came out on top, with a review of the trial judge’s judgment that could readily be described as excoriating. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 10:14 am by Robin Happel
As the world’s first binding treaty to explicitly protect environmental defenders, the Escazu Agreement was a turning point – although, notably, the United States and many other countries are not signatories. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 12:46 pm by Kevin
The abstract is safe for you, though: The middle finger is one of the most commonly used insulting gestures in the United States. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
Crawford, a U.S. district court in Tennessee recently came to the same conclusion in Harbison v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
-boycotted Caribbean island nation into the select group of the United States, Germany and Russia that produce vaccines with efficacy of more than 90% - Novavax, Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna and Sputnik V. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 8:08 am by Jim Gerl
 Congress has stated that encouraging independent living for people with disabilities is the policy of the United States government. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 1:30 pm by Luke Hawthorne (AU)
”  Of particular concern to Apple in this latter regard is the fact that some of the evidence obtained by the Registrar came from the solicitors acting for Microsoft Corporation in Australia, in circumstances where Microsoft Corporation has opposed Apple’s corresponding application for the registration of APP STORE as a trade mark in the United States of America. [read post]