Search for: "Chambers v. State" Results 4821 - 4840 of 4,896
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
As one commenter stated: “In the hours and days following a cybersecurity breach, companies must quickly and efficiently contain, minimize, and remedy any damage or loss resultin [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am by Jane Chong
At minimum, bribery covers not just the taking but the giving of a bribe, and state of mind is key. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 4:50 am by Graham Smith
  That should become clearer after the outcome of Liberty’s appeal to the Court of Appeal in its judicial review of the Act and various pending references to the CJEU.Meanwhile the recent Strasbourg judgment in Big Brother Watch v UK (yet to be made final, pending possible referral to the Grand Chamber) has exposed a separate set of flaws in the IP Act’s predecessor legislation, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA). [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:13 am by Helen Klein Murillo
As Quinta and I explained: Under United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
This Settlement Agreement proposes to compromise a claim the United States has at this Site for Past Response Costs, as those terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 10:01 am by Daniel Jin
In October 2019, the House of Commons Justice Committee published its report “Court and Tribunal reforms“[5] on the modernization programme and stated: “Courts service modernization, including the use of better IT to be more efficient, is long overdue”. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 8:05 pm by Béligh Elbalti
Concerning the principle of convenience, Article 14 of the CCCA states that Bahraini courts have jurisdiction over cases filed against non-Bahraini [defendants] who have domicile or residence in Bahrain, except for in rem actions concerning immovable properties located abroad. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm by Patricia Hughes
An Australian law firm’s “Tips and tricks for online hearings” refers to a ruling by the Federal Court of Australia that a case with 50 witnesses that was scheduled for six weeks would proceed virtually, despite the objection of one of the parties (Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (Adjournment)). [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 11:20 pm
In a recent 5-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 5:15 am by Rob Robinson
(Your Secrets Are Safe Here) - http://bit.ly/rgPGAS (Ralph Losey) When You Know, You Know: Cache La Poudre Feeds LLC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am by Jay Pinho
” Several weeks later, on July 18, Justice Elena Kagan appeared at Georgetown as well, where she recounted her memorable Kimble v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:21 am by New Books Script
K 564 C6 C415 2012 Virtual economies and financial crime : money laundering in cyberspace / Clare Chambers-Jones. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:39 am
The Supreme Court Thursday is expected to issue arguably the most anticipated decision since 2000's Bush v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 2:14 am
  Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 2:41 am by Irene Marchioro (University of Bologna)
In 2003 the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) drafted a force majeure and a hardship clause, which were revised last March to face the COVID-19 pandemic.3) ICC Force Majeure and Hardship Clauses, March 2020. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 5:48 pm by Yvonne Nath
  Certain states started to relax restrictions around the business and practice of law. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 9:59 am by Eric Turkewitz
Scalia: “There Is No Right to Secede” (2/16/10) The right of a state to secede from the nation is way outside my personal injury wheelhouse. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 6:16 am
We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(7) of the Florida Constitution. [read post]