Search for: "Child v. Child" Results 4821 - 4840 of 31,283
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Guest Blogger
   We explained in Red Families v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 2:25 am by Molly Adams
In the Court of Appeal case of Sharp v Sharp [2017] EWCA Civ 408, even though the marriage lasted around 6 years, it was still considered to be short enough to deviate from the 50:50 split. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:32 am
Contents include:Pratik Dixit, Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India: decriminalising India’s sodomy law Camila Teixeira, Priority, agency and cooperation: how international human rights law helps fulfil the economic and social rights of the most vulnerable Hoko Horii, A blind spot in international human rights framework: a space between tradition and modernity within the child marriage discourse Nomisha Kurian, Rights-protectors or rights-violators? [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 7:03 am by Chris Castle
It must also be noted that there is currently a class action against TikTok in Illinois for child endangerment and violations of child privacy protections through TikTok’s biometric data collection. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 1:34 pm by Zachary Margulis-Ohnuma
That just might have changed today with the advent of United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:02 pm by Parker Rider-Longmaid
In the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 9:34 am by Site Admin
But what I wanna highlight for this video is actually a wrinkle, which is that if you make less than $150,000 as a married couple and you have a dependent child or less than $75,000 with a dependent child, there’s actually a new tax credit of $500. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 10:30 am by Howard Bashman
“Barbara Lagoa Would Bring an Atypical Background to the Supreme Court; Not well-connected in Washington and New York law circles, the child of Cuban exiles has spent most of her career in Florida”: Corinne Ramey and James V. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 8:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Perhaps because of this, courts have generally struck down bans on the publication of government officials' home addresses, see Publius v. [read post]