Search for: "Does 1 - 20"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 28,808
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2022, 4:37 am
A defendant who does not lodge a statement of opposition within that 30-day time limit may, in a number of exceptional cases, apply for a review of the order pursuant to Article 20 of the Regulation. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 1:30 am
Nestle opposed all three applications on the grounds that: (i) the marks did not fulfil the requirements of a "sign" under section 1(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, challenged under section 3(1)(a) of the Act; and (ii) whether the marks had distinctiveness under section 3(1)(b) of the Act. [read post]
16 May 2023, 1:05 am
The purpose of this grace period is to allow the designer or its successor to test the products in which the design is embodied in the market (Recital 20 CDR). [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Section 1 is self-executing in the latter regard, but not the former. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 2:04 am
(i) For persons under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, a license to the Government resulting from a rights determination under Executive Order 10096 does not constitute a license so as to prohibit claiming small entity status. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 1:30 am
Nestle opposed all three applications on the grounds that: (i) the marks did not fulfil the requirements of a "sign" under section 1(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, challenged under section 3(1)(a) of the Act; and (ii) whether the marks had distinctiveness under section 3(1)(b) of the Act. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 12:39 am
Modak (2008) 1 SCC 1). [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 12:25 pm
” pp. 19 – 20. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
Staff summarized 20 decisions. [read post]
20 May 2012, 6:59 pm
“If you are profitable, the No. 1 reason is high taxes. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 12:00 pm
" Your reply attempted to defend DOE from our findings that 20 percent of DOE's contracts that ended in Fiscal Years 2007 and 2008 exceeded their contract amounts by 25 percent, or more," Thompson wrote. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
For this last week, the most-consulted three English-language decisions were: 1. [read post]
13 May 2020, 7:54 am
The plaintiffs were especially interested in the 24/7 channels, which stream movies that Nitro TV does not have a license for. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 12:16 am
CV-10-0172-PR (AZ 1/18/11). [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 2:29 am
Note, however, that the majority does not say that the mark creates a double entendre. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:10 pm
Rule 1:39-6(d) provides in part that a “fee division may be made without regard to services performed or responsibility assumed by the referring attorney, provided that the total fee charged the client relates only to the matter referred and does not exceed reasonable compensation for the legal services rendered therein. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 2:28 am
On 25.10.2019, the applicant submitted further argumentation in support of accepting a machine as the inventor, arguing Rule 19(1) EPC does not require that the inventor is a human and explaining that the purpose of Rule 19(1) EPC is to properly identify the inventor. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 10:17 am
There are different options I consider. 1. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 7:44 am
She is the author of the #1 selling book on cost containment, Workers Compensation Management Program: Reduce Costs 20% to 50%. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 1:35 pm
In addition, the order restrains the press from: 1. [read post]
