Search for: "Does 1 - 33"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 6,151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2011, 1:46 pm
Consequently, the law of the case doctrine does not prohibit consideration of whether, on the facts as they now exist, the Petitioners are landlocked under the statute. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:03 pm
Does this trend reflect a durable change in attitudes towards crime and punishment, or is this about short-term fiscal pressures and the need to reduce bloated corrections budgets? [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 12:12 pm
Does this reflect a durable change in attitudes towards crime and punishment, or is this about short-term fiscal pressures and the need to reduce bloated corrections budgets? [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am
In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include: 1.the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;2.the nature of the copyrighted work;3.the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and4.the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.The… [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
If Pinnock and proportionality did apply then the Supreme Court would need to grapple with the detail of how proportionality should operate, procedurally and substantively (issues 1-4 above). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
If Pinnock and proportionality did apply then the Supreme Court would need to grapple with the detail of how proportionality should operate, procedurally and substantively (issues 1-4 above). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 5:04 am
On February 1, 2011, Magistrate Judge Sorokin in the U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 5:04 am
On February 1, 2011, Magistrate Judge Sorokin in the U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 am
The FDIC does not publish the names of the institutions that it defines as problem institutions. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The paper originally published by the Gazette of Law and Journalism Part 1 of the paper was posted on 22 February 2011. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am
Lord Hope’s Decision in Powell I don’t intend here to go through the facts of Powell but rather to outline the stages of the review required that Lord Hope lays out in the judgment: 1. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:51 am
But this does not prevent the court considering proportionality. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:59 pm
Government employees 33 USC. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 10:42 am
The data in the below tables and in the detailed chart does not include companies conducting Say-On-Pay votes that are mandated by virtue of the company's participation in the Troubled Asset Relief Program and also does not include companies that voluntarily held Say-On-Pay votes (e.g., companies which held their annual shareholder meeting shortly before the January 21, 2011 effective date for Say-On-Pay but which nevertheless opted to voluntarily hold a Say-On-Pay… [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:00 am
”(2) See, 40 C.F.R 122.3(h) and LAC 33:IX.2315.A.8. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:08 am
So hitting his targets will bring Cunningham a cool $1 million for his short-term bonus, and $2.4 million in long-term incentive payments. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
Click here for the full MoFo publication SEC Proposes Amendments to Its Net Worth Standard for Accredited Investors. [1] The Proposing Release is available at http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2011/33-9177.pdf. [2] Pub. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 3:32 pm
Id. at 1348-49, citing In re Alappat, 33 F.3d 1526, 1545 (Fed. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
In Reynolds v Malocco (above), Kelly J held that the jurisdiction to award an interim injunction in libel cases was of a delicate nature, and that the courts must be circumspect to ensure that it does not unnecessarily interfere with the right of freedom of expression. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
If one was to approve the representative and understand this to be in contradiction with the text of T 828/94 reproduced in the “Case Law” book and, moreover, to J 9/86, and if one was also to assume, as does the representative, that it was possible to rely on the “Case Law” book alone, then the question would arrive as to how the representative would have to deal with such a contradiction in the context of the requirement of “taking ADuCaRC” under A… [read post]
