Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
Secondly, how must the claimant know what he has to know – that is, what state of mind, assessed subjectively or objectively or by a mixture of the two, amounts to knowledge for this purpose (“the how? [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 8:56 am
" United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:31 am
But in a short few years, forced marriage – and indeed the family life of South Asian Britons in particular – has become the subject of a significant regulatory web, involving aspects of family law, child law, the law of vulnerable adults, criminal law and immigration regulation (see Quila v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 45). [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 2:17 pm
" National Assoc. of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
In Kentucky State Bd. of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
In Kentucky State Bd. of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 10:17 pm
Mortgage Bankers Association v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:05 pm
Today it is recognised across the common law world that a claim for restitution founded on unjust enrichment is founded neither on consent nor on wrongdoing (see for example Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale and Kleinwort Benson v Birmingham City Council). [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 11:06 am
In Costa v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:15 pm
One recurrent issue before English courts is the whether EAWs issued at the earlier stages of inquisitorial proceedings are actually for the purposes of investigation or prosecution. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:42 am
The CA is similar to the Sherman Antitrust and Clayton Act in the United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
” In Yeager v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
Unless the state’s promise of equality actually also embraced a refund for those worse off, the differing outcomes for the taxpayers are not unconstitutional, the Court declared by a 6-3 vote in Armour, et al., v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
Potts v. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 9:22 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 9:51 am
There may be Bivens (Bivens v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:15 am
“Bedford, like most English towns and cities, is full of CCTV cameras and no CCTV camera captured Bento going to or coming from the lake. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:45 am
In Sulamerica Cia Nacional de Seguros Sa v Enesa Engenharia SA [2012] EWCA Civ 638, the Court of Appeal found that the decision of Mr Justice Cooke (previously reported here) that an anti-suit injunction in favour of arbitration proceedings was valid would be upheld.At first instance, Cooke J held that the arbitration agreement in question was governed by English, not Brazilian law and that the arbitration clause prevailed over the exclusive jurisdiction clause which specified that… [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
The judge focused on Shaffer v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:20 am
Texas has stated that it considers black and Latino students “under-represented” at the university, based in part on their proportions in the state population. [read post]
