Search for: "English v. English"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 11,200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2016, 8:08 am
Lynn Shellfish Limited and others v Loose and another is a dispute over what the Aldeburgh poet George Crabbe called ‘shelly sands’. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:54 am
The case is Martin v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Stuart Budd & Sons Limited v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 5:40 am
" That's from Althouse discussing the 4th Circuit case of Bauer v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
https://t.co/bGMN6YpnxR -> Google Can Derive Undisclosed Economic Benefits From CAPTCHAs–Rojas-Lozano v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 4:45 pm
He married an English woman which caused him to visit London only briefly on a couple of occasions. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 3:14 pm
The officer and the driver conversed in English. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 3:14 pm
The officer and the driver conversed in English. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:33 am
In Ocean Pastures Corporation v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 5:24 am
No, according to Meyer v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm
Quinn Heraty reports on the trademark battle to make us forget SPAM v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 5:16 am
Martin v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 9:33 am
There was no dispute that the courts had jurisdiction to try the case against Exel under English jurisdiction. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:29 am
At the time of Ulysses’ publication, the Hicklin test, from the English court case of Regina v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 8:15 am
The IP High Court of Japan said in its judgment on FRAND issues in the 2014 Apple v Samsung case (English translations of the judgments are available here) that relatively few public opinions (invited by the court, as reported earlier in IPKat) suggested that the court should apply the Antimonopoly Act. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
Bank v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 2:38 am
The case of Sobrinho v Impresa Publishing ([2016] EWHC 66 (QB)) was a defamation claim in respect of an article in a Portuguese newspaper which alleged illegality on the part of a banker. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:10 pm
The Impresa case shows that English courts will not be quick to infer serious harm in cases involving relatively limited circulation which involve parties who are foreign, even if the allegations are serious. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 3:07 am
Spirits, 563 F.3d at 1353, 90 USPQ2d at 1493; see Corporacion Habanos, S.A. v. [read post]
