Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF T W" Results 4821 - 4840 of 8,735
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2014, 7:53 am by Barry Barnett
Of the 14 antitrust cases it’s ruled on, eight were on substantive matters and six on procedural issues. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 12:14 pm
The details of how location and contacts matter are somewhat complicated. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm by Marty Lederman
Lee, that "[w]hen followers of a particular sect enter into commercial activity as a matter of choice, the limits they accept on their own conduct as a matter of conscience and faith are not to be superimposed on the statutory schemes which are binding on others in that activity,” at least where “[g]ranting an exemption . . . to an employer operates to impose the employer’s religious faith on the employees. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 5:27 am
  The matter then went to the Supreme Court of Ohio. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 1:46 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Alleging that the public confused the PTA with the PTO didn’t matter in the absence of a plausible allegation of confusion of PTA with Leason Ellis, or even with law firms generally. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
If ever there were a president who would have revived the faith, it was George W. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
Second, a review of the parties’ briefs, both on the merits and with respect to the standing question, makes clear that these matters are at the heart of the parties’ dispute. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:05 am
[T]he Commonwealth stated that compelling [him] to enter the key to encryption software on various digital media storage devices that had been seized by the Commonwealth was essential to the discovery of `material’ or `significant’ evidence relating to the defendant's purported criminal conduct. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:22 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Gov’t doesn’t do as well as property rights for liberty.As applied: the institutional and legal details matter. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:01 pm by John Elwood
Carter 12-1497Issue: (1) Whether the Wartime Suspension of Limitations Act – a criminal code provision that tolls the statute of limitations for “any offense” involving fraud against the government “[w]hen the United States is at war,” 18 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 1:50 pm by Marty Lederman
  The Court simply asserts that "[w]e doubt that the Congress that enacted RFRA—or, for that matter, ACA—would have believed it a tolerable result to put family-run businesses to the choice of violating their sincerely held religious beliefs or making all of their employees lose their existing healthcare plans. [read post]