Search for: "J. White" Results 4821 - 4840 of 7,530
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2007, 7:35 am
See The Federalist No. 51, p. 349 (J. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 1:47 pm
  Accepting the government's proffer as true, the court found that the "merger problem" identified in Santos does not arise here.Lawyers: Michael Rosen (Law Office of Michael Rosen), Diarmuid White (White & White), Peter J. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 12:42 am by Lawrence A. Kogan
Multinationals have curried too much favor, as they usually do, with new occupants of the White House to gain cover for their prior indiscretions. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 12:55 pm by John Floyd
  Five Years in Prison for Voting Illegally   “I find it amazing that the government feels she made this up,” Mason’s defense attorney J. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
S.E.C., 472 U.S. 181, 232 (1985) (White, J., concurring in the judgment). [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:30 am by Jordan Brunner
The Post notes that Flynn’s resignation could complicate the visit, as it deprives Netanyahu of his strongest ally inside the White House for raising pressure on Iran. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:34 pm by Graham Smith
The effect of Article 15 can be seen in the ECJ decisions of SABAM v Scarlet and SABAM v Netlog prohibiting content filtering injunctions, and in Arnold J’s Cartier judgment itself:“If ISPs could be required to block websites without having actual knowledge of infringing activity, that would be tantamount to a general obligation to monitor. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:37 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Over the last few weeks, Congress and the White House have been circling one another, angling for that final bit of leverage that will define whether President Obama does or does not get to fulfill his first-week-in-office pledge to shutter the Guantanamo Bay detention facility. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:34 pm by Graham Smith
The effect of Article 15 can be seen in the ECJ decisions of SABAM v Scarlet and SABAM v Netlog prohibiting content filtering injunctions, and in Arnold J’s Cartier judgment itself:“If ISPs could be required to block websites without having actual knowledge of infringing activity, that would be tantamount to a general obligation to monitor. [read post]
9 May 2014, 2:14 pm
Mention should also be made of a handful of South African government jurists during the rule of apartheid, most notably South Africa’s former judge, Richard J. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Dred Scott is an evil decision because slavery and white supremacy are evil practices, and not because some flaw existed in the interpretive modalities adopted by the Taney Court. [read post]