Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 7,890
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2012, 5:57 am
Air Force) The Litigation Hold Letter - http://bit.ly/NFOdND (White and Williams LLP) Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) 2011 Proceedings - http://1.usa.gov/LkRQgt (NIST) TREC-Legal 2011: Learning to Rank from Relevance Feedback for eDiscovery (PDF) http://1.usa.gov/NyEuMh (Peter Lubell-Doughtie, Kenneth Hamilton) Updated Technology Assisted Review Backgrounder (Links From 2.1.2012 Thru 7.16.2012) http://bit.ly/IiTGtb (@OrangeLT)… [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm
State, 763 So.2d 1094, 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).Relief SoughtPetitioner requests the issuance of a writ of prohibition that: (1) quashes the order setting this cause for retrial; (2) prohibits the trial court from retrying Petitioner and (3) forever discharges Petitioner for the crimes charged. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:32 am
A judge said this week that the right to remain anonymous does not extend to a commenter who insinuated someone committed a crime.District Court Judge John Luster says the Spokane Spokesman-Review newspaper has to reveal the identity of a commenter known as “almostinnocentbystander. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 4:14 pm
Next, your disability benefits are reduced $1 for every $2 of income you receive in a given month. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
"When faced with a FOIL request, an agency must either disclose the record sought, deny the request and claim a specific exemption to disclosure, or certify that it does not possess the requested document and that it could not be located after a diligent search (see Public Officers Law § 87 [2]; § 89 [3]; Corvetti v Town of Lake Pleasant, 239 AD2d 841, 843 [3d Dept 1997])" (Beechwood Restorative Care Ctr., 5 NY3d at 440-441). [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:13 pm
There are a number of issues in play right now -- questions to which voters deserve answers: 1) Why won't Romney come clean about his taxes? [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:28 pm
If you are looking to hire an attorney find someone that: 1) is a CERTIFIED SPECIALIST IN ESTATE PLANNING TRUST AND PROBATE LAW; 2) only knows about probate, trust and estate law on their website; 3) has been practicing for many years. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:45 pm
On July 2, 2012 ALJ Margaret Brakebusch followed the Boards’ oft-criticized decision in D.R. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:20 am
Spend your money 2. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
A controlled substance named or described in s. 893.03(1)(a), (1)(b), (1)(d), (2)(a), (2)(b), or (2)(c) 4., commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084 [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:58 pm
Slip op. at 1. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 1:22 pm
Does he know what his Justice Department is doing now? [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:13 am
Look at John Quincy Adams, John Tyler, and Andrew Johnson. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 3:26 pm
§ 36-92-1 in 2002? [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 1:02 pm
Here’s what Brian had to say: 1. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:45 am
It does four things: (1) it proposes a methodology for measuring the complexity of international criminal trials; (2) it measures the complexity of trials conducted at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and then compares them to the complexity of trials conducted at other international courts and to trials conducted in US courts; (3) it proposes and then tests a model of what factors cause complexity in international trials; and… [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 10:28 pm
(1) Tap the icon for the Mail app; (2) Tap the compose new e-mail button at the bottom right of the screen; (3) Start to type a few letters of the person's name; (4) See the person's name appear in the list below the "To" field; (5) Tap the person's name; (6) Tap in the "Subject" field. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 7:04 pm
But it does. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 3:04 am
Interim interdict was granted on 3 November 2009. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:46 pm
On the conservative/libertarian side of things, there is significant disagreement about whether Chief Justice John Roberts' opinion was a "good" or "bad" thing from a legal, policy and political perspective, but there appears to be pretty widespread agreement that the Chief switched his position very late in the game - going from the four conservative justices who wanted to kill the whole damn thing on the grounds that it was an unconstitutional… [read post]
