Search for: "Light v. State Bar" Results 4821 - 4840 of 5,598
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2018, 1:50 pm by John Floyd
United States had an opportunity to interpret the broad reach of the JVTA. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 11:03 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
” Commissioner Koskinen, for his part, didn’t hesitate to place blame for the state of technology square at Congress’ feet, saying, “[i]t is not unusual for computers anywhere to fail, especially at the IRS in light of the aged equipment IRS employees often have to use in light of the continual cuts in its budget these past four years. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:30 am by Aaron Tang
Its single complaint about the interim map, that it fails to consider state requirements that county boundaries be respected, has long been rejected as a matter of both Voting Rights Act and constitutional (Gray v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 8:52 am by Stefanie Levine
Written by Gene Quinn (of IPWatchdog.com and Practice Center Contributor) The United States Patent and Trademark Office has provided an update to its Examination Guidelines concerning the law of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 in light of precedential decisions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued since the 2007 decision by the United States Supreme Court in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:49 am
Today's entry, published in the March, 2011 edition of The Florida Bar Journal, was written by Rutledge R. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:10 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Supreme Court case of Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am by David Pozen
The defense bar, at least, ought to mount constitutional attacks wherever the attacks might do some good. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 1:04 am
Light Dawns on Starr at High Court Legal Times Admitting new members to the Supreme Court bar is one of the Court's hoariest and most tightly scripted traditions. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:13 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
In Vance v Ball State University, the 5-4 majority endorsed a narrow definition of the meaning of “supervisor” for purposes of determining employer liability under Title VII. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:14 pm by John J. Sullivan
  After first precluding defendants from informally contacting plaintiffs’ treating physicians – ordinarily allowed under Stempler v. [read post]