Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 4821 - 4840
of 21,686
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 4:00 am
/Idaho v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 4:02 am
Velosolex America owns a U.S. trade mark "VS VELOSOLEX" since 2002 and distributes the "Black n Roll" Solex in the United States under the trade mark "Velosolex". [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 1:59 pm
The State was not, however, required to allege what measures it would have taken had the wholesaler disclosed the true basis for its “unilateral” actions.Utah alleged that the wholesaler’s fraud, rather than any other factor, had caused its reimbursement rates to increase, and that was sufficient.The decision is State of Utah v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 11:18 am
See, e.g., Smith v. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 1:01 am
Supreme Court, he heard the case Brown v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:44 am
I use a lot of ‘possibly’s and ‘maybe’s because we also don’t know for sure what the state of the Chinese register was in December 2009, and what an investigation of the Chinese register would have produced at that time. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 2:31 pm
The OHIM’s approach has been supported in BMI Bertollo Srl v OHIM, in which a national application in Italy which listed the headings of several classes was deemed to cover all goods and services which compromised those classes.5. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 8:51 am
State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 6:54 am
Art 104 of the Regulation states:(1) A Community trade mark court hearing an action referred to in Article 96 [i.e. counterclaims for revocation/declaration of invalidity], other than an action for declaration of non-infringement, shall, unless there are special grounds for continuing the hearing, of its own volition, after hearing the parties, or at the request of one of the parties and after hearing the other party, stay the proceedings where the validity of the Community trade… [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 1:17 pm
The list has a box next to each part, and the inspector is supposed to mark "yes" or "no" to indicate whether the part, including tires, is functioning properly. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 9:39 am
(See the Ozimals ruling, “17 USC 512(f) Preempts State Law Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown Notices” but see the Smith v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 9:57 am
ShareWednesday’s argument in Vidal v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:45 pm
Mr Hay sued in libel, stating that the publications had caused serious damage to his reputation and that he had lost bookings as a self-employed tattooist as a result. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 3:00 am
Barrington Music Products, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 4:34 pm
A recent Trademark Trial and Appeals Board opinion in Central Garden & Pet Co. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:04 am
At the Associated Press, Mark Sherman reports on National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:51 am
Mark Anderson, Respondents. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 4:45 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 12:34 pm
" Benedict Carey's installment today states at the outset that the billions in tax dollars spent on drug and alcohol treatment -- a number expected to grow with changes in federal law -- form a big question mark:. . . [read post]
