Search for: "Matter of Attorney General's Petition" Results 4821 - 4840 of 5,263
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  Gloria’s Ranch’s petition alleged that the lease expired in 2009 due to lack of production in paying quantities and alleged that it suffered damages for lost-leasing opportunities.[10]  Gloria’s Ranch amended its petition to include a claim for failure to pay royalties on production in Section 15 (from the unit well drilled by Chesapeake). [read post]
  Gloria’s Ranch’s petition alleged that the lease expired in 2009 due to lack of production in paying quantities and alleged that it suffered damages for lost-leasing opportunities.[10]  Gloria’s Ranch amended its petition to include a claim for failure to pay royalties on production in Section 15 (from the unit well drilled by Chesapeake). [read post]
  Gloria’s Ranch’s petition alleged that the lease expired in 2009 due to lack of production in paying quantities and alleged that it suffered damages for lost-leasing opportunities.[10]  Gloria’s Ranch amended its petition to include a claim for failure to pay royalties on production in Section 15 (from the unit well drilled by Chesapeake). [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 10:29 am by Stephen Bilkis
In as much as the Family Court petitions were consolidated into the Supreme Court matrimonial action, herein, the Supreme Court is a court of general jurisdiction, this court has the authority to determine the issue of the order of protection in the context of the consolidated divorce action. [read post]
  Gloria’s Ranch’s petition alleged that the lease expired in 2009 due to lack of production in paying quantities and alleged that it suffered damages for lost-leasing opportunities.[10]  Gloria’s Ranch amended its petition to include a claim for failure to pay royalties on production in Section 15 (from the unit well drilled by Chesapeake). [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:10 am by The Legal Blog
Accepting the petition, the High Court held: “Neither the Authority nor can the State Government amend the plan in such a way so as to destroy its basic feature allowing the conversion of open spaces meant for public parks. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 3:48 pm by Arthur F. Coon
” The Court noted the observation of the Attorney General in a letter put forward by a plaintiff that new development may be required to be “more GHG-efficient than [the 29% statewide reduction target], given that past and current sources of emissions, which are substantially less efficient than this average will continue to “exist and emit. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:01 am by Karen Greenberg
In a January 2020 ruling denying Saifullah’s habeas petition, D.C. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 3:48 pm
There are two types of jurisdiction: personal and subject matter. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:54 am by Danielle Parker
  **** SEC Matters SEC Revises Qualified Client Threshold. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 2:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The good news is that “the merits seem to matter in determining settlement amounts. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 1:15 pm by John Mikhail
  His report proposed the creation of five Consuls General to reside in Amsterdam, London, Paris, Madrid, and Lisbon, and he recommended “that each of the said Consuls General should be directed to nominate such and so many Consuls for Ports within his District, as he may from Time to Time think necessary and proper. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
‘I’m Going to Answer the Damn Question’: Barr, House Democrats face off over Portland, politicization USA Today – Kristine Phillips and Kevin Johnson | Published: 7/28/2020 Attorney General William Barr’s recent testimony before the House Judiciary Committee Barr came as Democrats investigate alleged political interference at the Justice Department, claiming the attorney general has turned it into a political annex of the… [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
”[31]  It reached this conclusion because “federal statutes are generally intended to have uniform nationwide application,”[32] and because of the presumption that “the federal program would be impaired if state law were to control. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 2:16 pm by Kevin F. Brady
” Adequacy When evaluating a lead plaintiff’s adequacy, courts generally accord the greatest weight to the presence or absence of conflicts of interest or economic antagonism. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm by Joel R. Brandes
" Of course, this offers the attorney representing a party to a Hague Convention proceeding little guidance. [read post]