Search for: "Michaels v State" Results 4821 - 4840 of 13,659
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2017, 1:19 pm by Lisa Daniels
Leibowitz then proposes a method by which the defense can destroy material obtained outside of discovery, while preserving any exculpatory or Brady material, by employing the framework used in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court was scheduled to hear argument later this month in Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:16 am by Dennis Crouch
(Daily.2016.Professors) Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:57 pm by Amy Howe
Finally, the justices asked the federal government to file a brief conveying its views on Loomis v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
 The Secretary of State, Karen Bradley, has written to the company [pdf] indicating that she is “minded” to issue a European Intervention Notice. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 2:30 pm by Jane Chong
” That process unfolds as follows: the Attorney General may (and reliably does) oppose the request for disclosure by filing an affidavit stating that the disclosure “would harm the national security of the United States,” per 50 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 4:34 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Julian Assange reportedly stated that this strategy was at the root of his efforts with WikiLeaks which, ironically, he aimed at “authoritarian” political parties.[3] Such publication can also undermine rule of law by reinforcing an ends-justify-the means value system. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
The justices issued an opinion on Wednesday in Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
In its original form, Part V introduces new criminal offences for disclosure of public authority and government data with no specified protection for public interest journalism. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
Today the court hears oral argument in Dean v. [read post]