Search for: "Powers v. Thomas"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 5,390
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2010, 10:28 am
All of the Court’s members except Justice Clarence Thomas were warmly engaged, and seemed determined at times to drive the arguments of counsel in Schwarzenegger v., Plata, et al. (09-1233) — the first case to reach the Court on the power of the courts to order a release of thousands of inmates from over-crowded prisons under a 1996 federal law. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:06 am
For example, in Ting v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas filed an opinion concurring in part with the majority. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:12 am
JZ 6368 T48 2011 The people vs. the state : reflections on UN authority, US power and the responsibility to protect Ramesh Thakur. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 4:36 am
In 1892, the Supreme Court upheld Reed’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:23 am
http://tinyurl.com/47udhb6 (Philip Gordon) Davis v. [read post]
15 Jul 2006, 7:32 am
But, like a lot of conservatives, he was so irritated by the Supreme Court's decision in Hamdan v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
Albert Thomas Paulek v. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 2:46 pm
From Brach v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am
” Justice Clarence Thomas in a concurring opinion offered a more detailed account of the history of the habeas writ and the Suspension Clause. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
Price points out that FDA restrictions on generic entry in the pharmaceutical and biologics markets can be more powerful than patents in blocking entry, and that restricting patent rights may drive companies to greater reliance on trade secrecy. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 11:38 pm
The day before the FTC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
It will look back to several important recent Supreme Court decisions, in particular Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 7:01 am
Thomas Koch of Hoffmann Eitle, noted. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:14 pm
For example, if A has sued B in state court for trademark infringement, and the case is about to be decided, a federal court should stay proceedings in the case of B v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:19 pm
§ 14-2801 (2004) (repealed). n2 A "disclaimer" n3 has been defined as "the refusal to accept an interest in or power over property. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 8:09 am
US v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
While certainly not the earliest expression of this argument, Thomas Babington Macaulay provides an oft-cited iteration of this critique. [read post]
