Search for: "Powers v. Thomas"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 5,390
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2009, 5:36 am
Justice Alito then turned to the famous case of Ricci v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 8:46 pm
 Justice Thomas more or less took Gura’s position in his dissent in Saenz v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 7:54 pm
But the government told a federal judge that the agreement threatens to give Google the power to increase book prices and discourage competition. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 11:51 pm
Justice Thomas, joined by Justice Scalia told us in Baze v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 4:52 am
After describing the equitable doctrines that are available under the law -- and how well those doctrines would seem to apply to financial market abuses (sub-prime loans being the modern equivalent of the Williams v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
October 31, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 9:32 am
Here is the abstract: Underlying Rand J's judgment in Roncarelli v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 7:18 am
Florida and Graham v. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 1:52 pm
According to CNET at least two class actions have already been filed in the Californian courts, including one (Thomson v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
[See pp. 165-204, on Vásquez.] [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 8:13 am
The New York Times discusses the separation-of-powers issues involved in Kiyemba v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 11:03 pm
I am grateful to Thomas Raphael, a barrister at 20 Essex Street and the author of a major work on The Anti-Suit Injunction, to have accepted to comment on the recent In Zone Brands decision of the Cour de cassation. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 2:04 pm
The author of "Public Use and Public Purpose after Kelo v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 7:00 am
In People v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 10:13 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 12:22 pm
Pawa, P.C. and Attorney Thomas J. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 3:39 am
Pawa, P.C. and Attorney Thomas J. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
Six of the sitting Justices are Roman Catholic (Sotomayor, Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito, and Kennedy), but Justice Clarence Thomas was absent; Justice Stephen G. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 10:43 am
On the first complaint, the facts of the case line up very closely with the Universal v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
I am thankful to my friend Eugene White for drawing to my attention a recent case from the ACT where a solicitor, David Landers, had some difficulties in dealing with ACT authorities on behalf of his client, a teacher who wanted to retire and get a payout due to illness.Because of the significance of this decision, I have set out the judgment in full.DAVID LANDER v COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY[2009] ACTSC 117 (11 September 2009)APPEAL - Appeal against… [read post]
