Search for: "Redding v. State" Results 4821 - 4840 of 5,118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
This has been established law since the decision in Clayton v Clayton [2006] EWCA Civ 878; [2007] 1 FLR. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:39 am by Vincent LoTempio
The ADA requires that individuals with disabilities be provided services in the most integrated setting appropriate, as determined by the Supreme Court in the landmark decision Olmstead v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 4:09 am by Emma Snell
  Moldovan MPs have passed a ban on Russian war symbols, including the letters Z and V and the St George ribbon. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 7:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
In May 2024, Colorado became the first state to adopt comprehensive AI-related legislation, as discussed here. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Decisions about voter list maintenance, one of the most essential bureaucratic duties of state election officials, received intense scrutiny in several states this year. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 4:50 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Kapes and CCC (Red Book) case—courts stated that individual numbers that were the product of various creative processes were copyrightable. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 9:17 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Its stated purpose is to benefit all persons, especially persons with disabilities, with a “Canada without barriers” in specified areas, including employment and the built environment. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
Renaissance * 1514: György Dózsa, székely man-at-arms and peasants’ revolt leader in Hungary, was condemned to sit on a red-hot iron throne with a red-hot iron crown on his head and a red-hot sceptre in his hand (mocking at his ambition to be king), by Hungarian oppressors in Transylvania. [read post]
15 May 2022, 9:11 pm by The Regulatory Review Staff
September 28, 2021 | States Regain Regulatory Power Over Predatory Loan Servicers | The Education Department’s new interpretation of federal law empowers states to protect student loan borrowers. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 1:40 pm by Tamara Robb
” Anonymous v Anonymous The January 2016 decision made in Gottlieb v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 10:05 am by Kara OBrien
While the letter makes it clear that a fund board cannot delegate its responsibility to make the required determinations, it expressly states that directors do not have to review each transaction in order to make the required determinations. [read post]