Search for: "S. Sherman"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 5,995
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2009, 11:06 pm
But why waste the Board's time and the parties' time by continuing with the other two claims? [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:46 pm
Sherman Act de 1890, ponele. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 11:34 pm
Texas Commission on Jail Standards chief Adan Munoz spoke to a group of Rotarians in Sherman and the writeup in the Herald-Democrat contained several interesting tidbits. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:29 pm
The Seventh Circuit's holding that the NFL is a single entity because it produces a product for which cooperation is essential is inconsistent with NCAA and numerous other cases that treat the degree of integration of a joint venture as a rationale for applying the rule of reason, not exemption from § 1 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 8:48 am
Access today's Order List of the U.S. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 6:19 am
The debate is heating up over next week's oral argument in Salazar v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 3:16 am
The appellate court had rejected a complaining apparel manufacturer's Sherman Act Section 1 claim on the ground that the league and teams were acting as a single entity when collectively licensing their intellectual property through a jointly-owned licensing affiliate.The government initially had urged the Court to reject the petition for review. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 10:32 am
Another indication of growing consensus between the agencies includes Assistant Attorney General Christine Varney's decision to withdraw the Antitrust Division's September 2008 report, entitled "Competition and Monopoly: Single-Firm Conduct Under Section 2 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 9:30 am
(Section 2 of the Sherman Act makes monopolization a felony.) [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 8:08 am
§ 101 and whether the “machine-or-transformation” test for patent eligibility, contradicts Congressional intent that patents protect “method[s] of doing business” in 35 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 8:05 am
Courts in general determine whether a particular restraint violates Section 1 of the Sherman Act in three steps. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 3:16 pm
In any event, there’s more on this front out Tuesday. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:35 am
Circuit’s decision last Friday in Emily’s List v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:59 am
Because a single entity cannot conspire with itself, it cannot violate section 1 of the Sherman Act, which prohibits concerted action that unreasonably restrains trade. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 9:44 am
As the parties continue to modify the settlement agreement, the DOJ issued a statement of interest to the court to provide the court with the Antitrust Division's concerns relating to a potential settlement. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
Alabama: Alabama Family Law Blog by Michael Sherman, Esq. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 3:18 pm
Evidence of the existence of the conspiracy includes but is not limited to admissions made by participants in the conspiracy, a guilty plea by one of the defendants to a violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, defendants’ suspension of officers who they believe may have participated in the cartel, defendants’ attempts to intimidate and bribe a whistleblower and economic behavior that would have been inconsistent with each defendant’s self-interest or… [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 1:26 pm
* (And this counts John Jay, who is more known as a diplomat than for his brief time on the Court).Let's hope this SCOTUS stamp trend continues until the third branch (including even its lesser lights) is as well represented as the more dangerous branches, and to the day that I can put a Sherman Minton on my outgoing eBay package alongside a Warren G. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Hyde Park, MA; Remy Jules, President) Bens-Best-Deals S Corp. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 5:08 am
The issue before the Court was whether the facts presented by these class actions fell within those certain circumstances under which § 1 of the Sherman Act could be “violated by tying two products or services together, whereby ‘the seller conditions the sale of one product (the tying product) on the buyer's purchase of a second product (the tied product). [read post]
