Search for: "Scott v State"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 5,548
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm
The case was Cullen v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 12:44 pm
The “foregone conclusion” doctrine was recently applied to the digital realm in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 5:32 am
From Watson v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:30 am
See Dred Scott v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 7:28 pm
Scott Greenfield has nicknamed the case Rakofsky v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:02 am
(quoting U.S. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 2:48 pm
Scott Peterson. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm
IN THE NEWS Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh testified that Roe v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 8:06 am
Scott’s Food Service Inc. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 7:18 am
” Carson Pirie Scott & Co. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:29 pm
United States. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Supreme Court case (South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 6:20 am
In Gastelum v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:20 pm
By Scott R. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State… [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 9:26 am
And at a House of Delegates committee hearing yesterday, Baltimore County State's Attorney Scott D. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
McRae and Webster v. [read post]
