Search for: "State v Greene"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 6,665
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Section 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 remains unamended by the rulings in Hirst v United Kingdom (No 2) (2006) 42 EHRR 849 and Greens and MT v United Kingdom (23 November 2010) that it offends against Article 3 Protocol 1 by imposing a blanket ban on prisoners from participating in elections. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 4:16 pm
Also, the State Secretary states that if copyright holders want to protect their work, they need to start applying technological measures. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:08 am
Green Building Council's Green Home Guide Connecting you to ideas, advice and green home professionals. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
(IP Dragon) DuPont learns that global IP theft doesn’t stop at the border (China Hearsay) Europe The chocolate menagerie: General Court decides on bunny, reindeer and mouse shapes: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v OHIM (jiplp) ECJ rules on legislative limitations on copyright protection for designs in Europe: Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa e Famiglia SpA (jiplp) AG delivers opinion in Viking Gas A/S v BP Gas A/S concerning trade mark law and refilling of… [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:43 am
Have a good week Best, as always Charon (PS… do you like my Green ink…? [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:05 am
Greene. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 7:44 am
Jay Greene of CNET News summarizes the brief and provides a preview of the case. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 7:15 pm
Dolan, Billionaire Obituaries 2011, Shades of Green, March 17, 2011. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:26 pm
EPW Hearing State & Local Perspectives On Transportation Morrison Enterprises v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:09 am
.], the board filed a 237-page response in State Supreme Court that denied Mr. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 6:29 am
The plaintiffs in Perez et al. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:48 am
Green County, State (civil case) [uploaded: 04/05/2011] [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:17 am
United States, 10-6866, and Setser v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 8:44 pm
Issue summaries are from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers and opinions below: Greene v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:26 am
Board of Chosen Freeholders of Burlington County, 10-945), and agreed to clarify when a decision by the Supreme Court on a issue of criminal law is to be treated as “clearly establishing” what the law is for purposes of applying it in state criminal cases that are taken on to federal courts in habeas pleas (Greene v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 8:05 am
Board of Chosen Freeholders (No. 10-945) and Greene v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:06 am
More on this case later.BTW, in Greene v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am
Murray (IP finance) United States US Patent Reform America Invents Act: First to Invent v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 2:07 pm
In Green v. [read post]
