Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 4821 - 4840
of 15,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2018, 9:20 am
But I don't, and I'm glad to continue citing Darby as an authoritative interpretation of the Constitution.So what this boils down to is that I await a fully developed argument, independent of reference to what some state attorney general might have said, about why a sensible constitutional designer, presumably desiring to create a document that, in Marshall's word, is to "endure" through time, would adopt a scheme of amendment that a) is needlessly… [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 7:35 am
Civ.R. 9(C). [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 7:22 am
Brown v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 2:12 am
“[I]t does not appear that [Complainant’s] mark is used outside the United States (aside from the fact that Internet users worldwide presumably can view Complainant’s website). [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Perales 75 B. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 9:09 pm
” Stancil v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 3:40 am
ShutEmDown Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:01 am
Of course it was; the state’s attorney appeared virtually to concede the point at argument today. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:49 pm
All this spells e-n b-a-n-c to me. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:05 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:50 pm
Id. at *13.C. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 10:14 am
V(1)(c). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Notably, the petitioner did not testify that she had directed any of her aides to specifically supervise the student at the time of the incident.Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the determination of the Justice Center that the petitioner committed category three neglect (see Matter of Williams v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 151 AD3d at 1356-1357; see also Matter of Kelly v New York State… [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 2:03 pm
So, understandably, some people believe that states could limit the agenda of an Article V convention. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Arnold B. [read post]
Employee organization may not rely of a FOIL request to obtain the names of charter school employees
19 Nov 2010, 5:21 am
"“If anything,” said the court, "it is precisely because no governmental purpose is served by public disclosure" of this information that §87 2)(b)(iii)'s privacy exemption falls squarely within FOIL's statutory scheme. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 10:41 am
See Tucker v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:16 pm
P. 56(c). [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 5:24 am
United States v. [read post]
