Search for: "State v. Good Bear"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 5,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
Staying with the context of antitrust law, take the example of FTC v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 1:35 am
Spisak's cases, the federal courts' decisions to overturn the death sentences hinged on Mills v. [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 3:02 am
I took a look at the filings made on December 27 and 28 in the case, McIntosh v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:31 am
Gottlieb notified Agent Azad and Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey Knox that he was representing defendant and asked that his client not be interviewed unless he was present. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
The objectively ascertainable personal injury caused by an assault bears no relation to a human evaluating and reacting to what people say and write. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:28 am
The McGraw-Hill Case Which brings us to last week’s decision by the Manhattan-based Appellate Division, First Department, in Retirement Plan for General Employees v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 12:54 am
.
A2190
Bacalles -- Requires non-indigent prisoners to bear the cost of medical care provided by the county or city of New York to such non-indigent prisoners while in prisonSUMM : Amd SS500-h, 500-n & 508, Cor L Requires non-indigent prisoners to bear the cost of medical care provided to them by the county or city of New York while such non-indigent prisoners are in prison. 01/16/07 referred to correction
LAW / CORRECTNSA2228
Lafayette (MS) --… [read post]
The Slovak Constitutional Court on Risk Profiling and Automated Decision-Making by the Tax Authority
17 Dec 2021, 11:46 am
In their recent opinion on the Big Brother Watch and Others v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:14 pm
The case is Jones v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 4:42 pm
Healthcare The Order (i) directs the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to work with states and tribes to safely import prescription drugs from Canada, pursuant to the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003; (ii) directs the Health and Human Services Administration (HHS) to increase support for generic and biosimilar drugs, which can provide low-cost options for patients; (iii) directs HHS to issue a comprehensive plan within 45 days to combat high prescription drug prices and price gouging,… [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:30 am
Corp. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:52 am
Damage to the plaintiffs’ property by the armed forces of the Russian Federation constitutes an exception to the state’s judicial immunity, in line with customary international law, which, according to the Court, is confirmed in Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts and in practice of the International Court of Justice (North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany/Netherlands) Case) and practice of the European Court of… [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 1:02 am
The Court's decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:54 am
As the Supreme Court has previously said, viewpoint discrimination is when the state is “attempting to give one group an advantage over another in the marketplace of ideas,” and that’s just not what the disparagement bar is. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm
Cotter, Nominal Damages—and Nominal Damages Workarounds—in Intellectual Property Law TransUnion v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 2:38 pm
Cited: Collier v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:20 pm
One does not develop a help desk from the bottom up--nor necessarily with a view to enlarging the primacy of human rights holders who tend to bear the consequences of adverse human rights impacts.[12] Instead, it tends to be more efficient to target those collective organs into which positive responsibility for the care and protection of human rights harms bearers authority are vested. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 10:04 pm
Reasons for judgement were released today (Heppner v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
Smith v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:35 am
Smith v. [read post]
