Search for: "State v. Good Bear" Results 4821 - 4840 of 5,195
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
See Good Fences Make Good Neighbors but Bad Fences Make Appellate Opinions. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 5:30 am
Bush's circuit court nominees than for any other president in United States history. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Any defect in the plea colloquy had no bearing on his ultimate sentence, and the trial court properly considered mitigating factors. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica)   Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP)   Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
Obama attorney-general pick good news for IP, says US Chamber of Commerce (IAM) ‘The future of the patent system’ features four former PTO leaders (Hal Wegner) CAFC to hear oral argument in USPTO v GSK & Tafas 5 December (Anticipate This!) [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 8:52 am
In this respect, the Court must bear in mind that the right of every person under the Convention to be presumed innocent includes the general rule that no suspicion regarding an accused's innocence may be voiced after his acquittal (see Asan Rushiti v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
Court of First Instance rejects Lego’s appeal against OHIM’s Board of Appeals decision that Lego brick shape not registrable as a Community trade mark (Ars Technica) (Techdirt) OHIM opposition quality standards – the Office responds (IPKat) Charlie McCreevy puts forward proposal to reduce CTM fees by about 40% (Managing Intellectual Property) (Class 46) New protected geographical indications: French PGI Boeuf de Bazas for fresh meat and offal; Finnish PGI Kainuun… [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 10:55 pm
Does the State’s method of choosing replacement judges bear on federal constitutional due process? [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 7:00 am
There may be good political reasons for stalling, and reasonable arguments about the right scope and locus of state intervention, but skipping regulation altogether is bizarre. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 4:52 am
"At the bench trial on damages, the district court determined that, as to the claims brought under the Lanham Act and state laws, disgorgement was the proper remedy and it awarded Andrew $685,307.70, representing Poof's profits from the garments bearing the infringing hang-tag. [read post]