Search for: "State v. Holder" Results 4821 - 4840 of 8,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
See, e.g., Lockheed Martin Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:03 am by Peter Mahler
Tungsten Partners LLC v Ace Group International LLC, 2017 NY Slip Op 32025(U) [Sup Ct NY County Sept. 20, 2017], involving the same Delaware LLC at issue in the Estate of Calderwood case (#6 above), in which the trial court held that the holder of a 4% non-voting profits interest, nonetheless identified in the operating agreement as a “Management Member,” was entitled to inspect the LLC’s books and records. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am by John Elwood
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 11:38 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
Likewise, he joined Roberts’ 2010 majority opinion in Holder v. [read post]
That said, Mah Kiat Seng may not be the last word on the status of public interest immunity in Singapore law, given the previous conflicting decision in BSD v Attorney-General [2019] SGHC 118. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:22 am by Hutko
In addition, intermediaries are obliged to report to all right holders (sic!) [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:22 am by Hutko
In addition, intermediaries are obliged to report to all right holders (sic!) [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:22 am by Hutko
In addition, intermediaries are obliged to report to all right holders (sic!) [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am by David N. Crapo
Justice Sonia Sotomayor delivered the Supreme Court’s unanimous opinion1 in Truck Insurance Exchange v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am by David N. Crapo
Justice Sonia Sotomayor delivered the Supreme Court’s unanimous opinion1 in Truck Insurance Exchange v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am by David N. Crapo
Justice Sonia Sotomayor delivered the Supreme Court’s unanimous opinion1 in Truck Insurance Exchange v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 7:35 am by Terry Hart
(I briefly discussed this idea in More on Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons.) [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 4:59 am
  The panel provided a brief reminder of the key UK and CJEU cases dealing with the meaning of (1) an act of “communication” and (2) a “public”, both in the context of re-transmission of broadcast signals (SGAE v Rafael Hotels Case C-306/05, SCF v Marco Del Corso Case C-135/10, ITV v TV Catchup Case C-607/11 and Reha Training v GEMA Case C-117/5) and P2P networks (Polydor v… [read post]