Search for: "State v. House" Results 4821 - 4840 of 28,798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2022, 11:48 am by Giles Peaker
Camfield & Ors v Uyiekpen & Anor (HOUSING – RENT REPAYMENT ORDER – evidence – pro forma witness statements) (2022) UKUT 234 (LC) An appeal from an FTT decision dismissing an application for a rent repayment order, which shows the importance of establishing ALL the elements of a relevant offence, while also providing a snapshot of the horrorshow that is ‘get rich quick’ rent to rent set ups. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:45 am by Marissa Miller
In the New York Times, Robert Pear reports that Democratic Congressional leaders have filed an amicus brief in Douglas v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 10:52 am by Patricia Salkin
Anderson v City of San Jose, 2019 WL 6317875 (CA App. 11/26/2019) [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 5:13 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: Relying on United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:39 pm by Marty Lederman
  CSS also  operates two “congregate-care” facilities, which provide group housing for children in the City’s care (distinct from the foster-care system).) [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 2:05 pm by Giles Peaker
The London Borough of Croydon v Lopes [2017] EWHC 33 (QB) Costs on settled s.204 Housing Act 1996 appeals – the issue that never goes away. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 6:45 am by Matthew Hill
The Court noted that the House of Lords in N were concerned to distinguish the case of D v UK (1997) 24 EHRR 423. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
Lucy, an African American graduate student, enrolled at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, pursuant to a court order in the case of Lucy v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by William Ford
The House Judiciary Committee held a hearing Sept. 18 on oversight of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), examining specifically whether to reauthorize four provisions of the act set to expire in December. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 9:07 am by Biersdorf & Associates
In 2005, when the Supreme Court revealed the decision in the now infamous eminent domain case, Kelo v. [read post]