Search for: "State v. Key" Results 4821 - 4840 of 20,422
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2007, 6:28 am
Siegel draws on this history to illuminate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's dissenting opinion in "Gonzales v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 11:16 am
It's a definite piece of advocacy -- indeed, a well-written and well-structured one -- and while it comes in many places perilously close to affirmatively misstating the law by entirely ignoring key distinctions, I think the thing is more properly viewed as being within the permissible (and very broad) bounds of proper advocacy. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
By a vote of 6-3, the court dismissed as moot a Second Amendment challenge to New York City’s now-repealed limits on transporting personal firearms, in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 9:40 am by Matthew B. Kaplan
Voluntariness is a key issue in these cases because the United States Supreme Court ruled in 1967 in the landmark case of Afroyim v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 9:40 am by Matthew B. Kaplan
Voluntariness is a key issue in these cases because the United States Supreme Court ruled in 1967 in the landmark case of Afroyim v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 5:43 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
The most well-known case brought under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, to date, has been United States v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
Set to take effect January 2023, HB 2492 was passed after the state emerged as a key electoral winner for President Biden in the 2020 US Presidential election, a result which brought about widespread and unfounded claims of voter fraud. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 11:08 am by Miriam Seifter
By defining the key statutory term “waters of the United States,” the rule determines, among other issues, which water bodies are subject to the act’s discharge limitations and permitting requirements. [read post]