Search for: "State v. Laws" Results 4821 - 4840 of 157,928
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2011, 2:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Last December, I reported on the Supreme Court of Kentucky's decision in Schnuerle v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:12 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Although binding precedent holds that our state courts do not have jurisdiction over such matters, see Hartley v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 2:23 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
The proposition that federal law trumps state law if there is a conflict is not in dispute. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 9:43 am
Defendant won his search issue on the state law nighttime search law when being prosecuted for child sexual abuse; Kelley v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 8:49 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
State Farm, a brother against brother (insurance company v. insurance company) squabble that may change permissive use law in Maryland (hopefully the CoA grants cert). [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 8:49 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
State Farm, a brother against brother (insurance company v. insurance company) squabble that may change permissive use law in Maryland (hopefully the CoA grants cert). [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 7:55 am by Rick Hasen
I noted on the blog the other day that the state of Georgia, after losing in the state court of appeals, declined to appeal further the ruling that Georgia law allows counties to set Saturday as a day of early… Continue reading The post If Petitioners Get Their Way in Moore v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 8:06 am by Steven D. Schwinn
Schwinn, John Marshall Law School The Eleventh Circuit ruled in Alabama Department of Corrections v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 4:25 am by Immigration Prof
A group of more than 100 immigration law professors signed a statement calling the preliminary injunction ruling in Texas v. [read post]
9 Nov 2024, 10:31 am by Eric Goldman
The plaintiffs claim that IXL “collected and monetized the data of millions of school-age children who used the IXL platform without parental consent,” in violation of the ECPA and state law. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:13 am by sally
Regina (Sinclair Collis Ltd and another) v Secretary of State for Health [2011] EWCA Civ 437; [2011] WLR (D) 200 “The prohibition on the sale of tobacco from automatic vending machines was justified on the ground of the protection of public health, was proportionate and therefore did not violate EU law by its adverse effect on the business of the operators of vending machines and suppliers in other EU states. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:42 pm by H. Scott Leviant
A class was certified.After the United States Supreme Court issued AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 3:45 pm by Michel-Adrien
The Victorian Law Reform Commission (state of Victoria, capital Melbourne, Australia) has published an Issues Paper on Recklessness in the local criminal law: "Recklessness is an element in many Victorian offences and relevant to the application of the criminal law in other ways. [read post]