Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2014, 7:20 am
When trade marks overlap. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:14 am
The Court set out the three factor test noted in Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 2:34 am
This case illustrates the need for brand owners to have a zero-tolerance approach and be vigilant about trade mark misuse by others, to protect themselves with registered trade marks and use the courts to enforce where necessary. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 4:19 am
Kaszuba d/b/a Hollywood Group v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 10:42 pm
” (Now that one of the most significant trade mark cases in modern times has drawn [or is about to draw!] [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 10:51 am
5 years ago, in U.S. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:14 am
By Mark S. [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:50 am
At Education Week’s School Law blog, Mark Walsh observes that the “lengthy gestation period” of the Court’s forthcoming decision in Fisher v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 5:45 am
State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 2:19 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 3:02 am
" Ashe v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 12:00 am
In the case of Lynch v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 11:49 am
Rumsfeld and Ziglar v. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 4:00 am
Roy, (October 24, 2024).Mark V. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 9:00 am
In David Swartz, et al., v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 5:07 am
And if that is what you want, X marks the spot. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 10:38 am
Panah v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 6:44 pm
United States, No. 16-1371. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 1:35 pm
IBSA Institut Biochimique, v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 10:01 am
Rumsfeld and Ziglar v. [read post]
