Search for: "State v. Parks"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 10,192
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2012, 5:23 am
The case is Hill v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 10:15 am
The petition maintains that the Court has said (in Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
NYCERS rationally relied on the alternative payroll code appearing in the relevant time and attendance records, by which NYCERS effected the pension withdrawals and which does not appear on the Official List, to conclude that these additional withdrawals were erroneous (see also Matter of Adirondack Wild: Friends of the Forest Preserve v New York State Adirondack Park Agency, [*2]34 NY3d 184, 195 [2019]). [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 8:22 am
EME Homer City[1] and Seventh, United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 11:25 am
Allied Stores Int’l, Inc., as well as by the United States Supreme Court’s 1980 decision in Pruneyard Shopping Center v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:51 pm
Park St., Ste. 207, Lebanon, NH 03766. [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 10:16 am
State v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 12:59 pm
Staples v. [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
NYCERS rationally relied on the alternative payroll code appearing in the relevant time and attendance records, by which NYCERS effected the pension withdrawals and which does not appear on the Official List, to conclude that these additional withdrawals were erroneous (see also Matter of Adirondack Wild: Friends of the Forest Preserve v New York State Adirondack Park Agency, [*2]34 NY3d 184, 195 [2019]). [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
National Park Hosp. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:22 am
Hood v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 8:54 am
City of New York, 888 F.3d 612, 625 (2d Cir. 2018), which stated in turn:Relying on Grant v. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:00 am
The CBA further provides that the CSEA may request arbitration with respect to a grievance, but no provision in the CBA permits an employee to request arbitration, nor is there a provision that makes the employees a party to the collective bargaining agreement (see generally Matter of Case v Monroe Community Coll., 89 NY2d 438, 442-443 [1997]; Matter of Diaz v Pilgrim State Psychiatric Ctr. of State of N.Y., 62 NY2d 693, 695 [1984]). [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:00 am
The CBA further provides that the CSEA may request arbitration with respect to a grievance, but no provision in the CBA permits an employee to request arbitration, nor is there a provision that makes the employees a party to the collective bargaining agreement (see generally Matter of Case v Monroe Community Coll., 89 NY2d 438, 442-443 [1997]; Matter of Diaz v Pilgrim State Psychiatric Ctr. of State of N.Y., 62 NY2d 693, 695 [1984]). [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 9:19 am
Hood v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 6:54 am
In 2014, the Court affirmed the "coincide" requirement in Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 8:02 am
§285), and numerous states have taken action against NPE's as well. [read post]
18 May 2025, 6:30 am
For example, the 1908 case People’s Pleasure Park Co v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:01 am
”… The Ninth Circuit will hear Askins v. [read post]
