Search for: "State v. South" Results 4821 - 4840 of 10,950
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2011, 8:33 pm by Jonathan Hafetz
And none involves a government assertion of “state secrets,” at least not yet. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 6:52 am
But they inform that the statistics are the same across the country, and includes the south, where Chapter 13 rates are higher in general. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 4:05 am
Hampton County was named a judicial hellhole in 2004 when South Carolina law permitted plaintiffs in the state to pick any county they wanted to bring suit, and taken off the list in 2005 when South Carolina fixed its venue rules, but, of course, Hampton County residents still get the friendly juries there. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:37 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
The recipient, in turn, will claim that the condition on the funds violates the limits of the Spending Clause, as enumerated in South Dakota v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 10:33 am by Lyle Denniston
  The South Carolina filing has not yet been made. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:53 am by Amy Howe
Its decision in Perez v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 9:49 am by Rob
  This statute has been held invalid (see Lett v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 3:20 am by Michael DelSignore
Courts in other states have held that the right to counsel attaches to the decision to submit to a breathalyzer test, including Oregon, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, and New York. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 5:20 am
The final argument, in South Carolina v. [read post]