Search for: "State v. Stephens."
Results 4821 - 4840
of 7,111
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2012, 3:10 am
JF 491 T54 2012 Constitutional referendums : the theory and practice of republican deliberation Stephen Tierney. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 5:31 am
Well-known Condominium Attorney Stephen M. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:36 am
And: The ruling leaves his treatment up to state mental health officials. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 11:48 am
Stephen Noffsinger testified. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 10:14 am
Moore’s counsel, Stephen D. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:41 am
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals rulings in Velez v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 3:24 am
Germany Claudia Schubert, Whistle-Blowing after Heinisch v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:40 am
The 2006 ruling in Cameron v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:07 am
KF 505 ZC2 D528 2012 Family law, gender and the state / Alison Diduck and Felicity Kaganas. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 11:30 pm
Housing and human rights The Nearly Legal blog sets out three recent decisions from the European Court of Human Rights on the subject of housing, including Bjedov v Croatia, Jarnea and others v Romania, and Costache v Romania. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 7:36 am
The homeowner selected Jeffery Pellet and Citizens selected Stephen White. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 9:30 am
Fullmer Legal Aid Attorney of the Year Award – Mary V. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:07 am
United States, the challenge to Arizona’s S.B. 1070 immigration law. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:21 pm
Recently, in Souza v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:11 am
On the other hand, he said, the Prop 8 opinion is narrow in that it's limited to a state that granted a right and then rescinded it whereas the DOMA case, Gill v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 4:14 am
Young, Jr., Stephen J. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:33 pm
A recent case, Dickerson v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 12:37 pm
” Writing for the majority in Perry v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:58 am
Their opinion said that the majority has now “declared that animus must have been the only conceivable motivation for a sovereign state to have remained committed to a definition of marriage that has existed for millenia….Even worse, we have overruled the will of seven million California Proposition 8 voters based on a reading of Romer [v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
Unless the state’s promise of equality actually also embraced a refund for those worse off, the differing outcomes for the taxpayers are not unconstitutional, the Court declared by a 6-3 vote in Armour, et al., v. [read post]
