Search for: "True v. United States" Results 4821 - 4840 of 9,184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2014, 8:09 am by Larry
United States, may impact the analysis in this case. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Existing democracies are fragile.[3] That includes the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 2:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here’s a very brief summary of that strand: In a long line of cases (such as Presbyterian Church in the United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-8629, and Beckles v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm by Melanie Fontes
  Instead of a true random draw, some person (e.g., a court administrator) or persons (e.g., a committee of experts) or thing (e.g., a computer via an algorithm)[15] places all the active judges, with the exception of the chief judge, into two equal groups. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 11:57 am by Grant Doty, ACLU of Eastern Missouri
Although this principle was articulated by the United States Supreme Court 22 years ago, it remains true even as libraries and schools open themselves to the world via the Internet. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 8:18 am by Guest Author for TradeSecretsLaw.com
By Marcus Mintz In a recent case filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Mainline Information Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 10:04 pm
   The Court specifically noted that  Although it is true that an adoption should be unnecessary because Sebastian was born to parents who marriage was legally recognized in this state, the best interests of this child require a judgment that will ensure recognition of both Ingrid and Mona as his legal parents throughout the United States. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:00 pm by Laura Dooley and Rodger Citron
The Court denied Du Pont’s request to review the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit’s judgment affirming the jury’s $40 million award in favor of plaintiffs, a married couple, asserting negligence claims against Du Pont. [read post]