Search for: "United States Court of Appeals,third Circuit" Results 4821 - 4840 of 6,585
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It’s disturbing, to say the least.Perhaps the United States will never be Gilead. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
The jury determined reasonable attorney's fees for both UTSW and Rohrmoos at $800,000 for representation in the trial court, $150,000 in the court of appeals, and $75,000 for representation in this Court.The trial court entered final judgment against Rohrmoos, stating:1. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 1:23 pm by Kevin Healey
The Third Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals stated, The term ‘all-risk’ has been said to be somewhat misleading. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:05 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-10154, probably returns for a second time. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 10:02 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Invoking the so-called dual sovereignties doctrine, the United States Supreme Court has held that a subsequent State prosecution based on the same facts and conduct underlying a prior Federal prosecution is not in violation of the double jeopardy proscription. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:24 am by Anna Christensen
  The Plant Protection Act of 2000 (PPA) directs the Secretary of Agriculture (or his designee—in this case, the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)) to promulgate regulations to prevent the “introduction of plant pests into the United States or the dissemination of plant pests within the United States. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 12:30 pm by Rebecca R. Hanson
For example, the United States Court of Appeal for the Third Circuit (covering Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and the Virgin Islands) recently upheld the dismissal of an FCA action, finding that the whistleblower had relied on his own experience, and not direct knowledge of actual events, in bringing the claim. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:49 pm
    Procedural HistoryK/S HIMPP (“HIMPP”) appeals from the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”) in an inter partes reexamination affirming the Central Reexamination Unit (“CRU”) Examiner’s decision not to reject claims 3 and 9 of U.S. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
” At Law360 (subscription required), Amy Lee Rosen reports that a “Third Circuit ruling on appeal to the Supreme Court that prevented an electricity supplier from claiming a double deduction on a consolidated tax return has some practitioners worried that, if accepted, the justices could solidify a stand-alone tax doctrine previously used only as a method of statutory interpretation. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 5:27 am
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit]has already ruled, El-Nahal had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the T–PEP data at issue. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 9:58 am
Winkle - "The State of Indiana brings this interlocutory appeal from the Shelby Superior Court's grant of suppression motions filed by Kevin J. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:44 am by Susan Brenner
The court then pointed out that the United States Supreme Court `consistently has held that a person has no legitimate expectation of privacy in information he voluntarily turns over to third parties. [read post]