Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 9,847
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2015, 10:41 am
” The United States Constitution forbids “Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole,” the Court wrote. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:26 am
Representative Charles Rangel asks this Court to review his 2010 censure by the United States House of Representatives. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:24 am
Beverages Direct sold the product exclusively to retail purchasers located in the United States. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:02 pm
Hepps (1986) (generally rejecting the view that the burden of proving truth can be placed on the defendant); R.A.V. v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 8:41 am
By negative implication, the Commerce Clause prevents the states from enacting laws that discriminate against or unduly burden interstate Commerce. [read post]
5 May 2015, 4:10 pm
In Lewis v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 6:57 am
In Mach Mining LLC v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 10:23 pm
The case is Glossip v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 5:49 pm
Here’s an excerpt from the federal district court decision (United States v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 11:18 am
In so holding, the court distinguished the United States Supreme Court’s earlier decision in Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 11:18 am
In so holding, the court distinguished the United States Supreme Court’s earlier decision in Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 10:18 am
Sanders (1963), the Court invalidated Georgia’s county unit system for vote counting in the Democratic primary for nomination of United States senator and statewide officers, including justices of the Supreme Court. [read post]
4 May 2015, 6:03 am
Pallante, Register of Copyrights and Director of the United States Copyright Office. [read post]
4 May 2015, 4:47 am
Grocery Manufacturers Assoc. v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 6:21 am
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 4:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:49 am
United States, 93 Fed. [read post]
1 May 2015, 7:46 am
The Chestnut Ridge Action The Chestnut Ridge Action was filed after the Town of Ramapo issued a negative declaration under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”) for development plans prepared by a predecessor to a Wesley Hills plaintiff, which included a religious school, community center, and 60 units of multi-family housing. [read post]