Search for: "United States v. David"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 6,867
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am
However, last year, in an abrupt reversal, the United States Supreme Court dramatically limited the extraterritorial application of U.S. securities laws in Morrison v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm
(David Bernstein) Several readers forwarded to me a link to a recent article in Democracy by Professor Jedediah Purdy, with requests to comment on it. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm
(David Bernstein) Several readers forwarded to me a link to a recent article in Democracy by Professor Jedediah Purdy, with requests to comment on it. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:30 pm
The order simply states that, "The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in these cases expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:45 am
That legislation contains a provision that authorizes the president to indefinitely imprison, without a criminal charge or court hearing, any suspected terrorist who is captured within the United States -- including American citizens. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:38 am
At some point thereafter, the United States moved him to Bagram in Afghanistan. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:44 pm
The Fifth Circuit released a 38-page opinion today regarding sentencing enhancements and terms of supervised release in a child pornography case, United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 12:00 pm
United States, and Florida v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:25 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 543 F.3d 586, 594 (9th Cir. 2008)). [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
David C. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:26 am
United States, in which the state has asked it to overturn the lower courts’ decisions blocking enforcement of four provisions of its controversial immigration law, S.B. 1070. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:15 am
Ct. 2729, 2733 (2011) (indirectly quoting R.A.V.); United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
It states that a site is not subject to action under the bill if it “engages in an activity that would not make the operator liable for monetary relief for infringing the copyright under section 512 of title 17, United States Code. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 5:43 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:47 am
” In an op-ed for the Denver Post, Tom Bie addresses the potential implications of PPL Montana for “anyone who likes fishing, rafting or canoeing public water in the United States. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:41 am
This arguably permitted modification of some of the eurozone rules through a Consensus vote of all EU members – this appears to have been shot down by the United Kingdom in particular. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 12:32 pm
A11A1313. -- September 14, 2011 John Craig Cotton, Saleem David Dennis, for Lindsey.William H. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 12:32 pm
A11A1313. -- September 14, 2011 John Craig Cotton, Saleem David Dennis, for Lindsey.William H. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
’[3] On the question of domestic law the Court finds that ‘the law of the United States has been uniform since its founding that corporations can be held liable for the torts committed by their agents. [read post]
