Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 4821 - 4840 of 10,392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2011, 3:19 am by Kelly
Bausch & Lomb, Inc (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Release of false marking claims applies to all products marked with patent mumbers: Simonian v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 3:06 pm
"Lawyers for the State of Louisiana asked the United States Supreme Court on Monday to reconsider its decision last month striking down laws that made child rape a capital offense. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm by Kelly
Highlights this week included: Lego brick cannot be registered as a trade mark, rules ECJ: Lego Juris v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 6:40 pm
Defendant Davist appeals from his sentence for false claims against the United States, conspiracy to defraud the United States, and false statements. [read post]
Impact of No-Hazard Determination Congress created the Federal Aviation Act to give power to the FAA to regulate the safety and efficiency of the United States’ airspace. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:29 pm by Thomas James
They do not extend to infringement occurring solely outside of the United States, even if consumer confusion occurs in the United States. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 12:59 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice Drug-Murder Conspiracy Convictions Largely Upheld; 120-Month Gun Discharge Sentence Remanded United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm by Marie Louise
Nuvasive, Inc., et. al (Docket Report) TransData – In smart meter patent suit TransData focuses antennae on Texas utility: TransData v Denton County Electric Cooperative (Green Patent Blog) US Trade Marks – Decisions District Court Maryland: Guess confusion isn’t such a big deal: Chattery Interanational v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 1:04 am
DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Criminal Practice Drug Trafficking Enterprise's 'Organizer or Leader' Not Entitled to 'Safety Valve' Sentence Treatment United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:45 am
  With the advent of the Roberts Court, it's time to wake up and recognize the fact that throughout our history, with the marked exception of the Warren Court, the Court has rarely protected those rights and that instead, the primary protector of those rights has been the comparatively majoritarian United States Congress. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 9:02 am
, this month marks the anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Loving v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:56 am
RU 14 is not a registered trade mark in Canada. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 3:04 am by Chijioke Okorie
Wend Wendland, adjunct professor at University of Cape Town's IP Unit shares initial thoughts on the Draft IP Protocol here. [read post]