Search for: "University System v. State"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 8,143
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2013, 1:52 pm
Commissioner (1989), relying on United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 8:56 am
An early case that included similar claims, Cahen v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 8:56 am
An early case that included similar claims, Cahen v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
United States (09-977); United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:00 am
Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 4:39 am
Vaxxion v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 10:23 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am
Who ought to be deciding various parts of the © system? [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 1:27 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System, Search run January 25, 2009. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
The Unnecessary Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2020).Nan D. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs Pennsylvania State University 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) lcb11@psu.edu Abstract: Humans create but do not regulate generative systems of data based programs (so-called “artificial” intelligence (“A.I.) and generative predictive analytics and its models. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 9:38 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 1:46 pm
Corbett v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 6:20 am
(People v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Yet Brown v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:14 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 4:56 pm
Engle v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:25 am
As of 1860, Denver had five competing court systems. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am
Dialogue, 27 U.S. 1 (1829) United States v. [read post]
The Indian Satellite Saga and Retaliation: Recognizing the Supreme Court of India’s Judgment Abroad?
24 Jun 2024, 7:03 pm
Since 2023, courts worldwide, including those in Australia, Canada, Germany, Mauritius, the Netherlands, Singapore, Switzerland, and the US, rendered decisions regarding whether to recognize the SCI Judgment and to allow it as a defence against the enforcement of arbitration awards.[1] This Insight analyzes these courts’ judgments and reflects on the decentralized judgment/award recognition and enforcement system for addressing alleged state retaliation measures. [read post]
