Search for: "v. AT&T Mobility"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 5,406
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2010, 5:00 am
[See: Bynorg v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 10:14 pm
Emcore offered no defense other than Optium hadn't met its burden. [read post]
3 May 2010, 4:22 am
A side by side comparison of the marks might highlight the difference between the "T" and the "D" but that is not the test for deceptive similarity. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:20 am
(H/T: My FIU colleague Manuel Gomez). [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 11:39 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 564 F.3d 1256 (2d Cir. 2009), the Ninth Circuit held that “Congress intended the usual and long-standing principles apply – post-filing developments do not defeat jurisdiction if jurisdiction was properly invoked as of the time of filing. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 6:26 am
State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:56 pm
(IP tango) Netherlands BREIN wants Dutch ISP to block The Pirate Bay (TorrentFreak) New Zealand Kiwi 3 strikes anti-piracy bill receives unanimous support (TorrentFreak) Poland Infringement of personal rights and company name in domain name – all in one case (Class 46) Sweden Hollywood: It’s time for court to impose Pirate Bay fines (TorrentFreak) Why a calendar company wants to take over The Pirate Bay (Ars Technica) Movie studios threaten strike on Pirate… [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:40 am
Opponents seem pretty well mobilized (Linda Greenhouse and San Francisco among them). [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:24 am
The first half of this sentence doesn’t make sense. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 2:15 pm
• MobileMedia Ideas, LLC v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 1:51 pm
AT & T Mobility LLC, 2010 WL 1532334 (N.D.Cal. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 8:05 pm
In Colwell v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:26 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 564 F.3d 1256 (11th Cir. 2009), which “reasoned that (1) § 1332(d)(5)(B)’s jurisdictional limitation applies to ‘proposed’ classes; (2) ‘jurisdictional facts are assessed at the time of removal’; and (3) ‘post-removal events [(including non- or de-certification)] do not deprive federal courts of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 1:12 pm
Lawson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 9:16 am
Judging from the expertise the Court displayed during oral arguments for City of Ontario v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:37 pm
Postal Service simply can’t absorb the losses associated with expanded postal subsidies. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 12:25 pm
., v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
(Sabbah v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 2:30 am
(Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (Copyright Litigation Blog) YouTube – Tech groups ask court to preserve DMCA safe harbors: Viacom v Youtube (Public Knowledge) (EFF) (Ars Technica) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions 9th Circuit applies California law to domain name ownership dispute and remands for determination of whether ‘innocent purchaser’ defense applies: CRS Recovery, Inc v Laxton (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 8:22 am
And, now, in Roberts v. [read post]
